Input: [Nationwide] -4.4% [New York City] 5.4% [Crime]

Output: Murder

Press Release   - Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg


Input: [Nationwide] -2.2% [New York City] 1.7% [Crime]

Output: Rape

Press Release   - Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg


Input: [Nationwide] -1.1% [New York City] 1.8% [Crime]

Output: Robbery

Press Release   - Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg


Input: [Nationwide] -3.2% [New York City] -9.0% [Crime]

Output: Assault

Press Release   - Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg


Input: [Nationwide] -2.5% [New York City] -4.0% [Crime]

Output: Violent Crime

Press Release   - Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg


Input: [Nationwide] -1.3% [New York City] -5.0% [Crime]

Output: Burglary

Press Release   - Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg


Input: [Nationwide] -0.6% [New York City] 2.1% [Crime]

Output: Larceny Theft

Press Release   - Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg


Input: [Nationwide] -13.1% [New York City] -6.2% [Crime]

Output: Motor Vehicle Theft

Press Release   - Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg


Input: [Nationwide] -1.6% [New York City] 0.3% [Crime]

Output: Property Crime

Press Release   - Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg


Input: [Nationwide] -1.7% (est.) [New York City] -0.8% [Crime]

Output: TOTAL INDEX

Press Release   - Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg


Input: [1] Real Men Love Their Wives as Christ Loves His Church [0]

Output: Magazine Articles


Input: [1] A Meditation on a Mature Marriage [0]

Output: Magazine Articles


Input: [1] Should I convert to Catholicism if I believe it to be true, even though it could hurt my marriage? [0]

Output: Quick Questions


Input: [1] Open Forum for Non-Catholics (Part I) [2] 8/13/2012 6pm ET [0]

Output: Radio Shows


Input: [1] The Coming Persecution? [2] 8/10/2011 6pm ET [0]

Output: Radio Shows


Input: [1] Q&A Open Forum [2] 9/6/2012 6pm ET [0]

Output: Radio Shows


Input: [1] Husbands, Love Your Wives [2] 8/25/2010 7pm ET [0]

Output: Radio Shows


Input: [0] Favorable Tax Climate [Ranking Nationally] 1st [Ranking in New England]

Output: 1st


Input: [0] Standard of Living [Ranking Nationally] 1st [Ranking in New England]

Output: 1st


Input: [0] Most Livable State [Ranking Nationally] 3rd [Ranking in New England]

Output: 1st


Input: [0] Safest State [Ranking Nationally] 1st [Ranking in New England]

Output: 1st


Input: [0] Child & Family Well-Being [Ranking Nationally] 1st [Ranking in New England]

Output: 1st


Input: [0] Healthiest State [Ranking Nationally] 5th [Ranking in New England]

Output: 1st


Input: [0] Per Capita Income [Ranking Nationally] 10th [Ranking in New England]

Output: 3rd


Input: [0] College Educated Population [Ranking Nationally] 8th [Ranking in New England]

Output: 3rd


Input: [Asset Class] US Large “Market” [Active Fund Return] +7.3% [Structured Fund Return] +7.9% [Index Return]

Output: +7.8%

Taking Indexing "To The Next Level" | Servo Wealth Management


Input: [Asset Class] US Large Value [Active Fund Return] +7.1% [Structured Fund Return] +9.0% [Index Return]

Output: +8.0%

Taking Indexing "To The Next Level" | Servo Wealth Management


Input: [Asset Class] US Small Value [Active Fund Return] +8.7% [Structured Fund Return] +9.3% [Index Return]

Output: +8.2%

Taking Indexing "To The Next Level" | Servo Wealth Management


Input: [Asset Class] Int’l Large Value [Active Fund Return] +6.6% [Structured Fund Return] +7.6% [Index Return]

Output: +6.7%

Taking Indexing "To The Next Level" | Servo Wealth Management


Input: [Asset Class] Int’l Small Value [Active Fund Return] +10.4% [Structured Fund Return] +10.4% [Index Return]

Output: +9.5%

Taking Indexing "To The Next Level" | Servo Wealth Management


Input: [Asset Class] Emerging Mkts Value [Active Fund Return] +11.2% [Structured Fund Return] +13.5% [Index Return]

Output: +12.6%

Taking Indexing "To The Next Level" | Servo Wealth Management


Input: [Asset Class] Short-Term Bonds [Active Fund Return] +2.8% [Structured Fund Return] +3.9% [Index Return]

Output: +3.5%

Taking Indexing "To The Next Level" | Servo Wealth Management


Input: [0] EU [Tory] Like the majority of politicians, wants the UK to be integrated even further into the EU [UKIP]

Output: Like the majority of the population, want the UK to leave the EU

Bloggers4UKIP: Farage: No deal offered to anyone


Input: [0] Immigration [Tory] Open borders to anyone and everyone who wants to move here, anyone from EU entitled to social housing and benefits [UKIP]

Output: Freeze economic immigration for 5 years then introduce points-based system for everyone wanting to move here

Bloggers4UKIP: Farage: No deal offered to anyone


Input: [0] Defence [Tory] Sharing an aircraft carrier with the French [UKIP]

Output: Properly funded military capable of defending our interests at home and abroad

Bloggers4UKIP: Farage: No deal offered to anyone


Input: [0] Economy [Tory] More government, more tax [UKIP]

Output: Shrink government as much as possible, bring £1tr public sector pensions into line with private sector, introduce flat tax and raise threshold to take low paid out of the tax system altogether

Bloggers4UKIP: Farage: No deal offered to anyone


Input: [0] Education [Tory] Continue the war against academic selection forcing children who will benefit most from a vocational education to persist in a one-size-fits all education system, suffering humiliation and disenchantment in the process [UKIP]

Output: Expand the grammar school system so children get an education suited to their needs and abilities, restore status of universities to institutions providing top quality higher education in useful subjects to people who will make use of it

Bloggers4UKIP: Farage: No deal offered to anyone


Input: [0] Crime [Tory] Soft on crime, soft on punishment, cut police budgets and officers [UKIP]

Output: Life means life, punish criminals properly, more police on the streets, withdraw from the EU Arrest Warrant, put the rights of victims first

Bloggers4UKIP: Farage: No deal offered to anyone


Input: [0] Health [Tory] Keep throwing more and more money at a failing system [UKIP]

Output: Provide NHS vouchers for those who prefer to see a doctor privately, free opticians and dentists on the NHS, put matrons back in charge of wards

Bloggers4UKIP: Farage: No deal offered to anyone


Input: [2012/13] 277 [0]

Output: Social care for older people and adults with disabilities


Input: [2012/13] 141 [0]

Output: Children’s services including social care (excluding schools)


Input: [2012/13] 76 [0]

Output: Repair and maintenance of roads, public transport and planning


Input: [2012/13] 60 [0]

Output: Culture, Communities and other services such as libraries


Input: [2012/13] 56 [0]

Output: Borrowing costs


Input: [2012/13] 39 [0]

Output: Capital costs paid for from revenue


Input: [2012/13] 35 [0]

Output: Waste management


Input: [2012/13] 28 [0]

Output: Future inflation, contingencies and reserves


Input: [2012/13] 712 [0]

Output: Total


Input: [05-Aug-15] FTSE index [1]

QATAR INVESTMENT FUND PLC ORD USD0.01 - London Stock Exchange


Input: [05-Aug-15] FTSE sector [1]

Output: Equity Investment Instruments

QATAR INVESTMENT FUND PLC ORD USD0.01 - London Stock Exchange


Input: [05-Aug-15] FTSE sub-sector [1]

Output: Equity Investment Instruments

QATAR INVESTMENT FUND PLC ORD USD0.01 - London Stock Exchange


Input: [05-Aug-15] Country of share register [1]

Output: IM

QATAR INVESTMENT FUND PLC ORD USD0.01 - London Stock Exchange


Input: [05-Aug-15] Segment [1]

Output: SET3

QATAR INVESTMENT FUND PLC ORD USD0.01 - London Stock Exchange


Input: [05-Aug-15] MiFID Status [1]

Output: Regulated Market

QATAR INVESTMENT FUND PLC ORD USD0.01 - London Stock Exchange


Input: [05-Aug-15] Exchange market size [1]

Output: 3,000

QATAR INVESTMENT FUND PLC ORD USD0.01 - London Stock Exchange


Input: [05-Aug-15] SEDOL [1]

Output: B1Z4070

QATAR INVESTMENT FUND PLC ORD USD0.01 - London Stock Exchange


Input: [05-Aug-15] ISIN number [1]

Output: IM00B1Z40704

QATAR INVESTMENT FUND PLC ORD USD0.01 - London Stock Exchange


Input: [0] Consumer Discretionary [Long] 17.6% [Short]

Output: -11.3%

Fund Profile Overview - Research Equity Long/Short Fund R5


Input: [0] Consumer Staples [Long] 5.3% [Short]

Output: -5.9%

Fund Profile Overview - Research Equity Long/Short Fund R5


Input: [0] Energy [Long] 3.4% [Short]

Output: -2.0%

Fund Profile Overview - Research Equity Long/Short Fund R5


Input: [0] Financials [Long] 20.5% [Short]

Output: -13.3%

Fund Profile Overview - Research Equity Long/Short Fund R5


Input: [0] Health Care [Long] 12.7% [Short]

Output: -4.7%

Fund Profile Overview - Research Equity Long/Short Fund R5


Input: [0] Industrials [Long] 12.8% [Short]

Output: -11.3%

Fund Profile Overview - Research Equity Long/Short Fund R5


Input: [0] Information Technology [Long] 20.1% [Short]

Output: -7.5%

Fund Profile Overview - Research Equity Long/Short Fund R5


Input: [0] Materials [Long] 3.7% [Short]

Output: -3.2%

Fund Profile Overview - Research Equity Long/Short Fund R5


Input: [0] Short-Term Investments [Long] <0.1% [Short]

Output: 0.0%

Fund Profile Overview - Research Equity Long/Short Fund R5


Input: [0] Telecommunication Services [Long] 0.7% [Short]

Output: -1.8%

Fund Profile Overview - Research Equity Long/Short Fund R5


Input: [0] Utilities [Long] 4.6% [Short]

Output: -4.5%

Fund Profile Overview - Research Equity Long/Short Fund R5


Input: 5.1% [Type of activity]

Output: Civic, political, professional, or international

Volunteers by Selected Characteristics, 2007


Input: 26.2 [Type of activity]

Output: Educational or youth service

Volunteers by Selected Characteristics, 2007


Input: 1.9 [Type of activity]

Output: Environmental or animal care

Volunteers by Selected Characteristics, 2007


Input: 7.8 [Type of activity]

Output: Hospital or other health

Volunteers by Selected Characteristics, 2007


Input: 1.3 [Type of activity]

Output: Public safety

Volunteers by Selected Characteristics, 2007


Input: 35.6 [Type of activity]

Output: Religious

Volunteers by Selected Characteristics, 2007


Input: 13.1 [Type of activity]

Output: Social or community service

Volunteers by Selected Characteristics, 2007


Input: 3.5 [Type of activity]

Output: Sport, hobby, cultural, or arts

Volunteers by Selected Characteristics, 2007


Input: 5.4 [Type of activity]

Output: Other/Not determined

Volunteers by Selected Characteristics, 2007


Input: [Votes] 980 [%] 25% [0]

Output: Taxes are at least 90% higher than they should be. We should NEVER help to raise or create a new tax. Cut spending!

Overwhelming majority of Libertarians reject revenue-neutral tax proposals in poll | Libertarian Party


Input: [Votes] 370 [%] 9% [0]

Output: Taxes are at least 50% higher than they should be. We should NEVER help to raise or create a new tax. Cut spending!

Overwhelming majority of Libertarians reject revenue-neutral tax proposals in poll | Libertarian Party


Input: [Votes] 822 [%] 21% [0]

Output: Taxes are already too high. We should NEVER help to raise or create a new tax. Cut spending!

Overwhelming majority of Libertarians reject revenue-neutral tax proposals in poll | Libertarian Party


Input: [Votes] 192 [%] 5% [0]

Output: Only if it's a trade to end marijuana prohibition. Better not to propose it. Make tax hikers fight for every increase.

Overwhelming majority of Libertarians reject revenue-neutral tax proposals in poll | Libertarian Party


Input: [Votes] 655 [%] 16% [0]

Output: Only if it's to trade one tax for another, such as the income tax for a sales tax, but only if total taxes go down.

Overwhelming majority of Libertarians reject revenue-neutral tax proposals in poll | Libertarian Party


Input: [Votes] 278 [%] 7% [0]

Output: Only if it's to trade one tax for another, but only if total taxes go down or stay the same.

Overwhelming majority of Libertarians reject revenue-neutral tax proposals in poll | Libertarian Party


Input: [Votes] 186 [%] 5% [0]

Output: Only if we need it to pay for a government service.

Overwhelming majority of Libertarians reject revenue-neutral tax proposals in poll | Libertarian Party


Input: [Votes] 487 [%] 12% [0]

Output: I have a different view.

Overwhelming majority of Libertarians reject revenue-neutral tax proposals in poll | Libertarian Party


Input: [Votes] 3,970 [0]

Output: Total votes cast:

Overwhelming majority of Libertarians reject revenue-neutral tax proposals in poll | Libertarian Party


Input: [1] 1,470,000,000 [Calumet Refining Cost]

Output: Market Capitalization

Analysis: Another Good Refinery Deal For Calumet - Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. (NASDAQ:CLMT) | Seeking Alpha


Input: [1] 863,000,000 [Calumet Refining Cost]

Output: Long Term Debt

Analysis: Another Good Refinery Deal For Calumet - Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. (NASDAQ:CLMT) | Seeking Alpha


Input: [1] 2,333,000,000 [Calumet Refining Cost]

Output: Total

Analysis: Another Good Refinery Deal For Calumet - Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. (NASDAQ:CLMT) | Seeking Alpha


Input: [1] 135,000 [2] bpd [Calumet Refining Cost]

Output: Refining Capacity

Analysis: Another Good Refinery Deal For Calumet - Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. (NASDAQ:CLMT) | Seeking Alpha


Input: [1] 17281 [2] $/bpd [Calumet Refining Cost]

Output: CLMT Value

Analysis: Another Good Refinery Deal For Calumet - Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. (NASDAQ:CLMT) | Seeking Alpha


Input: [1] 27 [Calumet Refining Cost]

Output: Refining Margin

Analysis: Another Good Refinery Deal For Calumet - Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. (NASDAQ:CLMT) | Seeking Alpha


Input: 9.7% 18.6% [Industry]

Output: Construction and engineering

Jobs Online Monthly Report - April 2012 - NZ Department of Labour


Input: -2.8% 9.1% [Industry]

Output: Hospitality and tourism

Jobs Online Monthly Report - April 2012 - NZ Department of Labour


Input: -5.4% -14.5% [Industry]

Output: Information technology

Jobs Online Monthly Report - April 2012 - NZ Department of Labour


Input: -5.8% -6.8% [Industry]

Output: Accounting, HR, legal and administration

Jobs Online Monthly Report - April 2012 - NZ Department of Labour


Input: -8.3% -21.4% [Industry]

Output: Education and training

Jobs Online Monthly Report - April 2012 - NZ Department of Labour


Input: -8.4% -8.7% [Industry]

Output: Sales, retail, marketing and advertising

Jobs Online Monthly Report - April 2012 - NZ Department of Labour


Input: -9.1% -3.7% [Industry]

Output: Healthcare and medical

Jobs Online Monthly Report - April 2012 - NZ Department of Labour


Input: -0.4% 7.7% [Industry]

Output: Other

Jobs Online Monthly Report - April 2012 - NZ Department of Labour


Input: Monthly change (Mar 12 – Apr 12) Annual change (Apr 11 – Apr 12) [Industry]

Output: Occupation

Jobs Online Monthly Report - April 2012 - NZ Department of Labour


Input: -0.1% 7.9% [Industry]

Output: Technicians and trades

Jobs Online Monthly Report - April 2012 - NZ Department of Labour


Input: -3.6% -7.5% [Industry]

Output: Professionals

Jobs Online Monthly Report - April 2012 - NZ Department of Labour


Input: -4.7% -4.6% [Industry]

Output: Managers

Jobs Online Monthly Report - April 2012 - NZ Department of Labour


Input: -3.1% -3.1% [Industry]

Output: Total skilled job vacancies

Jobs Online Monthly Report - April 2012 - NZ Department of Labour


Input: [1] $3,000

Output: Cut-off machine and ultrasonic cleaner for metallographic samples, resistance furnaces, variacs, vacuum pumps and gauges, crystal grower, etc.

February 27, 1963 - Linus Pauling Day-by-Day - Special Collections


Input: [1] 600

Output: Travel to scientific meetings

February 27, 1963 - Linus Pauling Day-by-Day - Special Collections


Input: [1] $58,726

Output: Total direct cost per year

February 27, 1963 - Linus Pauling Day-by-Day - Special Collections


Output: Indirect costs

February 27, 1963 - Linus Pauling Day-by-Day - Special Collections


Input: [1] 14,681

Output: 25% of total direct costs

February 27, 1963 - Linus Pauling Day-by-Day - Special Collections


Input: [1] $73,407

Output: Total cost per year

February 27, 1963 - Linus Pauling Day-by-Day - Special Collections


Input: [1] $367,035

Output: Amount requested for a period of five years

February 27, 1963 - Linus Pauling Day-by-Day - Special Collections


Input: [U.S. Job Estimates] 350,547 [Relation to Industry] Direct [Type of Energy Efficiency]

Output: Public Mass Transit

Fact Sheet: Jobs in Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency (2013) | White Papers | EESI


Input: [U.S. Job Estimates] 161,896 [Relation to Industry] Direct [Type of Energy Efficiency]

Output: Energy-saving Building Materials

Fact Sheet: Jobs in Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency (2013) | White Papers | EESI


Input: [U.S. Job Estimates] 73,600 [Relation to Industry] Direct [Type of Energy Efficiency]

Output: HVAC and Building Control Systems

Fact Sheet: Jobs in Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency (2013) | White Papers | EESI


Input: [U.S. Job Estimates] 56,190 [Relation to Industry] Direct [Type of Energy Efficiency]

Output: Green Architecture and Construction Services

Fact Sheet: Jobs in Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency (2013) | White Papers | EESI


Input: [U.S. Job Estimates] 49,863 [Relation to Industry] Direct [Type of Energy Efficiency]

Output: Professional Energy Services

Fact Sheet: Jobs in Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency (2013) | White Papers | EESI


Input: [U.S. Job Estimates] 36,608 [Relation to Industry] Direct [Type of Energy Efficiency]

Output: Appliances

Fact Sheet: Jobs in Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency (2013) | White Papers | EESI


Input: [U.S. Job Estimates] 19,210 [Relation to Industry] Direct [Type of Energy Efficiency]

Output: Energy-saving Consumer Products

Fact Sheet: Jobs in Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency (2013) | White Papers | EESI


Input: [U.S. Job Estimates] 16,129 [Relation to Industry] Direct [Type of Energy Efficiency]

Output: Battery Technologies

Fact Sheet: Jobs in Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency (2013) | White Papers | EESI


Input: [U.S. Job Estimates] 15,987 [Relation to Industry] Direct [Type of Energy Efficiency]

Output: Smart Grid

Fact Sheet: Jobs in Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency (2013) | White Papers | EESI


Input: [U.S. Job Estimates] 15,711 [Relation to Industry] Direct [Type of Energy Efficiency]

Output: Electric Vehicle Technologies

Fact Sheet: Jobs in Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency (2013) | White Papers | EESI


Input: [U.S. Job Estimates] 14,298 [Relation to Industry] Direct [Type of Energy Efficiency]

Output: Lighting

Fact Sheet: Jobs in Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency (2013) | White Papers | EESI


Input: [U.S. Job Estimates] 13,066 [Relation to Industry] Direct [Type of Energy Efficiency]

Output: Water Efficient Products

Fact Sheet: Jobs in Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency (2013) | White Papers | EESI


Input: [U.S. Job Estimates] 823,105 [Type of Energy Efficiency]

Output: TOTAL

Fact Sheet: Jobs in Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency (2013) | White Papers | EESI


Input: [Major] Electrical engineering [Males] +63% [Females]

Output: +72%


Input: [Major] Computer Science [Males] +61% [Females]

Output: +63%


Input: [Major] Mechanical engineering [Males] +61% [Females]

Output: +72%


Input: [Major] Finance [Males] +61% [Females]

Output: +55%


Input: [Major] Economics [Males] +60% [Females]

Output: +59%


Input: [Major] Accounting [Males] +53% [Females]

Output: +53%


Input: [Major] Mathematics [Males] +53% [Females]

Output: +50%


Input: [Major] Nursing [Males] +52% [Females]

Output: +59%


Input: [Major] Chemistry [Males] +48% [Females]

Output: +47%


Input: [Major] General business [Males] +46% [Females]

Output: +46%


Input: [Major] Political science/gov't [Males] +46% [Females]

Output: +47%


Input: [Major] Biology [Males] +44% [Females]

Output: +43%


Input: [Major] Communications [Males] +37% [Females]

Output: +45%


Input: [Major] History [Males] +35% [Females]

Output: +37%


Input: [Major] Sociology [Males] +35% [Females]

Output: +36%


Input: [Major] Liberal arts [Males] +34% [Females]

Output: +36%


Input: [Major] English language/lit. [Males] +34% [Females]

Output: +37%


Input: [Major] Anthro./archaeology [Males] +32% [Females]

Output: +36%


Input: [Major] Fine Arts [Males] +25% [Females]

Output: +29%


Input: [Major] General Education [Males] +24% [Females]

Output: +30%


Input: [Composite Rating] CR1 [Micro Enterprises ROI in %] Base Rate +1.40 % [Small Enterprises ROI in %] Base Rate +1.90 % [Medium Enterprises ROI in %]

Output: Base Rate +2.15 %

Bank of Baroda - India's International Bank - Interest Rates


Input: [Composite Rating] CR2 [Micro Enterprises ROI in %] Base Rate +1.75 % [Small Enterprises ROI in %] Base Rate +2.25 % [Medium Enterprises ROI in %]

Output: Base Rate +2.40 %

Bank of Baroda - India's International Bank - Interest Rates


Input: [Composite Rating] CR3 [Micro Enterprises ROI in %] Base Rate +2.00 % [Small Enterprises ROI in %] Base Rate +2.25 % [Medium Enterprises ROI in %]

Output: Base Rate +2.40 %

Bank of Baroda - India's International Bank - Interest Rates


Input: [Composite Rating] CR4 [Micro Enterprises ROI in %] Base Rate +2.50 % [Small Enterprises ROI in %] Base Rate +2.75 % [Medium Enterprises ROI in %]

Output: Base Rate +2.90 %

Bank of Baroda - India's International Bank - Interest Rates


Input: [Composite Rating] CR5 [Micro Enterprises ROI in %] Base Rate +2.75 % [Small Enterprises ROI in %] Base Rate +3.00 % [Medium Enterprises ROI in %]

Output: Base Rate +3.25 %

Bank of Baroda - India's International Bank - Interest Rates


Input: [Composite Rating] CR6 & below [Micro Enterprises ROI in %] Base Rate +3.25 % [Small Enterprises ROI in %] Base Rate +3.50 % [Medium Enterprises ROI in %]

Output: Base Rate +3.75 %

Bank of Baroda - India's International Bank - Interest Rates


Input: [0] 02/14/2014 [2] Article [1]

Output: The Bear Market in Gold & Silver Miners Is Most Likely Over


Input: [0] 01/22/2014 [2] Article [1]

Output: The Case for Large-Cap Dividend Stocks


Input: [0] 08/18/2011 [2] Article [1]

Output: Volatility is Not The Same As Risk in the Markets


Input: [0] 05/17/2011 [2] Article [1]

Output: US Earnings Peaking - Shift into Defensive Growth Stocks


Input: [0] 04/18/2011 [2] Article [1]

Output: Investing in Irish Bonds


Input: [0] 01/07/2011 [2] Article [1]

Output: The Gold Bull Market - Two Out Of Three Ain’t Bad


Input: [0] 09/25/2010 [2] Article [1]

Output: US Global Consumer Franchise Stocks


Input: [Average P/E Ratio] 19.3 [Group]

Output: Highest dividend payout

More Proof That Companies Shun Dividends at Their Own Peril


Input: [Average P/E Ratio] 15.6 [Group]

Output: Second highest dividend payout

More Proof That Companies Shun Dividends at Their Own Peril


Input: [Average P/E Ratio] 13.8 [Group]

Output: Third highest dividend payout

More Proof That Companies Shun Dividends at Their Own Peril


Input: [Average P/E Ratio] 12.2 [Group]

Output: Fourth highest dividend payout

More Proof That Companies Shun Dividends at Their Own Peril


Input: [Average P/E Ratio] 12.6 [Group]

Output: Lowest dividend payout

More Proof That Companies Shun Dividends at Their Own Peril


Input: [Average P/E Ratio] 17.2 [Group]

Output: No dividend

More Proof That Companies Shun Dividends at Their Own Peril


Input: [TOTAL] 2 [%] 0.3 [0]

Output: 1) It is an important piece of literature, but is largely irrelevant to our lives today

Codebook | Presbyterian Panel Survey, May 1998 - Communications Across the Church, Members | Data Archive | The Association of Religion Data Archives


Input: [TOTAL] 150 [%] 25.1 [0]

Output: 2) It is the record of many people's experience with God and is a useful guide for individual Christians in their search for basic moral and religious teachings

Codebook | Presbyterian Panel Survey, May 1998 - Communications Across the Church, Members | Data Archive | The Association of Religion Data Archives


Input: [TOTAL] 248 [%] 41.5 [0]

Output: 3) It is the Word of God and its stories and teaching provide a powerful motivation as we work toward God's reign in the world

Codebook | Presbyterian Panel Survey, May 1998 - Communications Across the Church, Members | Data Archive | The Association of Religion Data Archives


Input: [TOTAL] 126 [%] 21.1 [0]

Output: 4) It is the inspired, authoritative Word of God that is without error in all that it says about faith and morals

Codebook | Presbyterian Panel Survey, May 1998 - Communications Across the Church, Members | Data Archive | The Association of Religion Data Archives


Input: [TOTAL] 62 [%] 10.4 [0]

Output: 5) It is the inspired Word of God, without error not only in matters of faith, but also in historical, scientific, geographic, and other secular matters

Codebook | Presbyterian Panel Survey, May 1998 - Communications Across the Church, Members | Data Archive | The Association of Religion Data Archives


Input: [TOTAL] 9 [%] 1.5 [0]

Output: 9) More than one selected

Codebook | Presbyterian Panel Survey, May 1998 - Communications Across the Church, Members | Data Archive | The Association of Religion Data Archives


Input: [TOTAL] 8 [0]

Output: Missing

Codebook | Presbyterian Panel Survey, May 1998 - Communications Across the Church, Members | Data Archive | The Association of Religion Data Archives


Input: [TOTAL] 597 [%] 100.0 [0]

Output: TOTAL

Codebook | Presbyterian Panel Survey, May 1998 - Communications Across the Church, Members | Data Archive | The Association of Religion Data Archives


Input: [Survey Name (Academic Year] Alumni Outcomes Survey (Act) [1996-1997] NA [1997-1998] NA [1998-1999] NA [2000-2001] NA [2001-2002] NA [2002-2003] YES [2003-2004] YES [1999-2000]

Description and Timelines of Surveys | Institutional Research | Research | UND: University of North Dakota


Input: [Survey Name (Academic Year] Campus Quality Survey [1996-1997] NA [1997-1998] NA [1998-1999] NA [2000-2001] NA [2001-2002] NA [2002-2003] YES [2003-2004] NA [1999-2000]

Description and Timelines of Surveys | Institutional Research | Research | UND: University of North Dakota


Input: [Survey Name (Academic Year] CIRP College Senior Survey (CSS) [1996-1997] NA [1997-1998] NA [1998-1999] NA [2000-2001] NA [2001-2002] NA [2002-2003] NA [2003-2004] NA [1999-2000]

Description and Timelines of Surveys | Institutional Research | Research | UND: University of North Dakota


Input: [Survey Name (Academic Year] College Student Inventory (CSI) [1996-1997] NA [1997-1998] NA [1998-1999] NA [2000-2001] NA [2001-2002] NA [2002-2003] YES [2003-2004] YES [1999-2000]

Description and Timelines of Surveys | Institutional Research | Research | UND: University of North Dakota


Input: [Survey Name (Academic Year] Employer Satisfaction Survey [1996-1997] NA [1997-1998] NA [1998-1999] NA [2000-2001] NA [2001-2002] NA [2002-2003] NA [2003-2004] NA [1999-2000]

Description and Timelines of Surveys | Institutional Research | Research | UND: University of North Dakota


Input: [Survey Name (Academic Year] Environmental Assessment Survey * [1996-1997] NA [1997-1998] YES [1998-1999] NA [2000-2001] NA [2001-2002] YES [2002-2003] NA [2003-2004] YES [1999-2000]

Output: YES

Description and Timelines of Surveys | Institutional Research | Research | UND: University of North Dakota


Input: [Survey Name (Academic Year] Faculty Survey (HERI) [1996-1997] NA [1997-1998] NA [1998-1999] NA [2000-2001] NA [2001-2002] YES [2002-2003] NA [2003-2004] NA [1999-2000]

Description and Timelines of Surveys | Institutional Research | Research | UND: University of North Dakota


Input: [Survey Name (Academic Year] Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) [1996-1997] NA [1997-1998] NA [1998-1999] NA [2000-2001] NA [2001-2002] NA [2002-2003] YES [2003-2004] NA [1999-2000]

Description and Timelines of Surveys | Institutional Research | Research | UND: University of North Dakota


Input: [Survey Name (Academic Year] Freshman Survey (CIRP) [1996-1997] YES [1997-1998] YES [1998-1999] YES [2000-2001] YES [2001-2002] YES [2002-2003] YES [2003-2004] YES [1999-2000]

Output: YES

Description and Timelines of Surveys | Institutional Research | Research | UND: University of North Dakota


Input: [Survey Name (Academic Year] Freshman Survey (SIQ) [1996-1997] NA [1997-1998] NA [1998-1999] NA [2000-2001] NA [2001-2002] NA [2002-2003] NA [2003-2004] NA [1999-2000]

Description and Timelines of Surveys | Institutional Research | Research | UND: University of North Dakota


Input: [Survey Name (Academic Year] Graduating Student Survey * [1996-1997] NA [1997-1998] NA [1998-1999] NA [2000-2001] NA [2001-2002] YES [2002-2003] NA [2003-2004] NA [1999-2000]

Description and Timelines of Surveys | Institutional Research | Research | UND: University of North Dakota


Input: [Survey Name (Academic Year] National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) [1996-1997] NA [1997-1998] NA [1998-1999] NA [2000-2001] YES [2001-2002] NA [2002-2003] YES [2003-2004] NA [1999-2000]

Description and Timelines of Surveys | Institutional Research | Research | UND: University of North Dakota


Input: [Survey Name (Academic Year] Placement Survey * [1996-1997] NA [1997-1998] YES [1998-1999] YES [2000-2001] YES [2001-2002] YES [2002-2003] YES [2003-2004] YES [1999-2000]

Output: YES

Description and Timelines of Surveys | Institutional Research | Research | UND: University of North Dakota


Input: [Survey Name (Academic Year] Sophomore Satisfaction Survey * [1996-1997] NA [1997-1998] NA [1998-1999] NA [2000-2001] NA [2001-2002] NA [2002-2003] YES [2003-2004] NA [1999-2000]

Output: YES

Description and Timelines of Surveys | Institutional Research | Research | UND: University of North Dakota


Input: [Survey Name (Academic Year] Student Satisfaction Inventory (SSI) & Priorities Survey for Online Learners (PSOL) [1996-1997] NA [1997-1998] NA [1998-1999] NA [2000-2001] NA [2001-2002] NA [2002-2003] YES [2003-2004] YES [1999-2000]

Description and Timelines of Surveys | Institutional Research | Research | UND: University of North Dakota


Input: [Survey Name (Academic Year] Transfer Student Survey [1996-1997] NA [1997-1998] NA [1998-1999] NA [2000-2001] NA [2001-2002] NA [2002-2003] NA [2003-2004] NA [1999-2000]

Description and Timelines of Surveys | Institutional Research | Research | UND: University of North Dakota


Input: [Survey Name (Academic Year] UG Students and Information Technology (ECAR) [1996-1997] NA [1997-1998] NA [1998-1999] NA [2000-2001] NA [2001-2002] NA [2002-2003] NA [2003-2004] NA [1999-2000]

Description and Timelines of Surveys | Institutional Research | Research | UND: University of North Dakota


Input: [Survey Name (Academic Year] Withdrawing/Non-returning Student Survey (ACT) [1996-1997] NA [1997-1998] NA [1998-1999] NA [2000-2001] NA [2001-2002] NA [2002-2003] NA [2003-2004] YES [1999-2000]

Description and Timelines of Surveys | Institutional Research | Research | UND: University of North Dakota


Input: [Survey Name (Academic Year] Your First College Year (YFCY) [1996-1997] NA [1997-1998] NA [1998-1999] NA [2000-2001] NA [2001-2002] NA [2002-2003] YES [2003-2004] NA [1999-2000]

Description and Timelines of Surveys | Institutional Research | Research | UND: University of North Dakota


Input: [Survey Name (Academic Year] College Student Survey (CIRP) [1996-1997] NA [1997-1998] NA [1998-1999] NA [2000-2001] YES [2001-2002] NA [2002-2003] NA [2003-2004] NA [1999-2000]

Description and Timelines of Surveys | Institutional Research | Research | UND: University of North Dakota


Input: [Survey Name (Academic Year] Highlights From Surveys [1996-1997] NA [1997-1998] NA [1998-1999] NA [2000-2001] NA [2001-2002] YES [2002-2003] YES [2003-2004] YES [1999-2000]

Description and Timelines of Surveys | Institutional Research | Research | UND: University of North Dakota


Input: [Sector] Utilities [% Change]

Output: +1.3%

Wednesday Sector Leaders: Utilities, Financial - Forbes


Input: [Sector] Financial [% Change]

Output: +1.0%

Wednesday Sector Leaders: Utilities, Financial - Forbes


Input: [Sector] Energy [% Change]

Output: +0.5%

Wednesday Sector Leaders: Utilities, Financial - Forbes


Input: [Sector] Consumer Products [% Change]

Output: +0.4%

Wednesday Sector Leaders: Utilities, Financial - Forbes


Input: [Sector] Materials [% Change]

Output: +0.4%

Wednesday Sector Leaders: Utilities, Financial - Forbes


Input: [Sector] Industrial [% Change]

Output: +0.2%

Wednesday Sector Leaders: Utilities, Financial - Forbes


Input: [Sector] Healthcare [% Change]

Output: -0.6%

Wednesday Sector Leaders: Utilities, Financial - Forbes


Input: [Sector] Technology & Communications [% Change]

Output: -0.7%

Wednesday Sector Leaders: Utilities, Financial - Forbes


Input: [Sector] Services [% Change]

Output: -0.9%

Wednesday Sector Leaders: Utilities, Financial - Forbes


Input: [Votes] 31 [Answer]

Output: Yes, I have

Have you ever seen/caught people having sex in a public place?


Input: [Votes] 23 [Answer]

Output: No, I haven't

Have you ever seen/caught people having sex in a public place?


Input: [Votes] 19 [Answer]

Output: No, but I've seen people making out in public

Have you ever seen/caught people having sex in a public place?


Input: [Votes] 20 [Answer]

Output: I'd like to see people having sex in public

Have you ever seen/caught people having sex in a public place?


Input: [Votes] 7 [Answer]

Output: I wouldn't like to see people having sex in public

Have you ever seen/caught people having sex in a public place?


Input: [Votes] 6 [Answer]

Output: I'm not sure how I would feel if I saw people doing this

Have you ever seen/caught people having sex in a public place?


Input: [Votes] 27 [Answer]

Output: I have had sex in a public place

Have you ever seen/caught people having sex in a public place?


Input: [Votes] 5 [Answer]

Output: I have something else to say

Have you ever seen/caught people having sex in a public place?


Input: [0] 1M [Returns] -15.40% [Total Returns]

Output: -15.40%

AGQ - Stock Quote and Charts for ProShares Ultra Silver


Input: [0] 3M [Returns] -20.27% [Total Returns]

Output: -20.27%

AGQ - Stock Quote and Charts for ProShares Ultra Silver


Input: [0] 6M [Returns] -31.85% [Total Returns]

Output: -31.85%

AGQ - Stock Quote and Charts for ProShares Ultra Silver


Input: [0] 1Y [Returns] -53.46% [Total Returns]

Output: -53.46%

AGQ - Stock Quote and Charts for ProShares Ultra Silver


Input: [0] 3Y [Returns] -80.19% [Total Returns]

Output: -80.19%

AGQ - Stock Quote and Charts for ProShares Ultra Silver


Input: [0] 5Y [Returns] -73.16% [Total Returns]

Output: -73.16%

AGQ - Stock Quote and Charts for ProShares Ultra Silver


Input: [Keedysville, MD] Not Available [Maryland] $91,591,230,000 [United States] $4,690,741,823,000 [2012 Retail Sales Statistics]

Output: Total Retail Sales (including Food Services)

Keedysville, MD Demographics Summary - CLRSearch


Input: [Keedysville, MD] Not Available [Maryland] 6.59% [United States] 6.40% [2012 Retail Sales Statistics]

Output: Building Materials and Garden Store Sales

Keedysville, MD Demographics Summary - CLRSearch


Input: [Keedysville, MD] Not Available [Maryland] 5.15% [United States] 4.81% [2012 Retail Sales Statistics]

Output: Clothing and Accessories Store Sales

Keedysville, MD Demographics Summary - CLRSearch


Input: [Keedysville, MD] Not Available [Maryland] 2.21% [United States] 2.15% [2012 Retail Sales Statistics]

Output: Electrical and Appliances Store Sales

Keedysville, MD Demographics Summary - CLRSearch


Input: [Keedysville, MD] Not Available [Maryland] 15.73% [United States] 13.07% [2012 Retail Sales Statistics]

Output: Food and Beverage Store Sales

Keedysville, MD Demographics Summary - CLRSearch


Input: [Keedysville, MD] Not Available [Maryland] 10.86% [United States] 10.71% [2012 Retail Sales Statistics]

Output: Food Services

Keedysville, MD Demographics Summary - CLRSearch


Input: [Keedysville, MD] Not Available [Maryland] 9.38% [United States] 11.22% [2012 Retail Sales Statistics]

Output: Gasoline Stations Store Sales

Keedysville, MD Demographics Summary - CLRSearch


Input: [Keedysville, MD] Not Available [Maryland] 11.89% [United States] 13.54% [2012 Retail Sales Statistics]

Output: General Merchandise Store Sales

Keedysville, MD Demographics Summary - CLRSearch


Input: [Keedysville, MD] Not Available [Maryland] 5.46% [United States] 5.77% [2012 Retail Sales Statistics]

Output: Health and Personal Care Store Sales

Keedysville, MD Demographics Summary - CLRSearch


Input: [Keedysville, MD] Not Available [Maryland] 2.15% [United States] 1.94% [2012 Retail Sales Statistics]

Output: Home Furnishings Store Sales

Keedysville, MD Demographics Summary - CLRSearch


Input: [Keedysville, MD] Not Available [Maryland] 2.32% [United States] 2.60% [2012 Retail Sales Statistics]

Output: Miscellaneous Store Sales

Keedysville, MD Demographics Summary - CLRSearch


Input: [Keedysville, MD] Not Available [Maryland] 8.04% [United States] 8.50% [2012 Retail Sales Statistics]

Output: Nonstore Purchases Sales

Keedysville, MD Demographics Summary - CLRSearch


Input: [Keedysville, MD] Not Available [Maryland] 2.09% [United States] 1.91% [2012 Retail Sales Statistics]

Output: Sporting Goods Store Sales

Keedysville, MD Demographics Summary - CLRSearch


Input: [221 - 224 records of 224] Date Posted [<< | More Recent]

Output: Article Title

Breaking Health News - CHI Health, Omaha, Nebraska (NE)


Input: [221 - 224 records of 224] 08/11/2014 [<< | More Recent]

Output: Exercise Cuts Breast Cancer Risk in Older Women, Study Finds But the effect quickly fades once workouts stop, researchers noted

Breaking Health News - CHI Health, Omaha, Nebraska (NE)


Input: [221 - 224 records of 224] 08/08/2014 [<< | More Recent]

Output: Older Adults Sharpest in the Morning, Study Finds This might be best time of day to schedule mentally challenging tasks

Breaking Health News - CHI Health, Omaha, Nebraska (NE)


Input: [221 - 224 records of 224] 08/07/2014 [<< | More Recent]

Output: Mental Decline Often Precedes a Stroke, Study Finds Study suggests assessing seniors' memory, thinking skills to identify those at risk

Breaking Health News - CHI Health, Omaha, Nebraska (NE)


Input: [221 - 224 records of 224] 08/06/2014 [<< | More Recent]

Output: Low Vitamin D Levels May Boost Alzheimer's Risk, Study Finds But it's too soon to recommend supplements, dietary changes for prevention

Breaking Health News - CHI Health, Omaha, Nebraska (NE)


Input: [221 - 224 records of 224] 221 - 224 records of 224 [<< | More Recent]

Output: << | More Recent

Breaking Health News - CHI Health, Omaha, Nebraska (NE)


Input: Competitive and Negotiated Issues by Number of Issues [2014] 1st [2013] 1st [2012] 1st [2011]

Output: 1st


Input: Competitive and Negotiated Issues by Par Amount [2014] 12th [2013] 11th [2012] 11th [2011]

Output: 12th


Input: Competitive Issues by Number of Issues [2014] 1st [2013] 1st [2012] 1st [2011]

Output: 2nd


Input: Competitive Issues by Par Amount [2014] 5th [2013] 4th [2012] 5th [2011]

Output: 5th


Input: Competitive and Negotiated Issues $20 Million or Less by Par Amount [2014] 1st [2013] 1st [2012] 1st [2011]

Output: 2nd


Input: Competitive and Negotiated Issues $50 Million or Less by Par Amount [2014] 1st [2013] 2nd [2012] 1st [2011]

Output: 5th


Input: Competitive and Negotiated Issues $100 Million or Less by Par Amount [2014] 6th [2013] 4th [2012] 5th [2011]

Output: 8th


Input: [Votes] 17 [%] 2.05 [Option]

Output: I defend to the death the company (or companies) from which I buy stuff, always.


Input: [Votes] 95 [%] 11.46 [Option]

Output: I tend to stick with the same company


Input: [Votes] 132 [%] 15.92 [Option]

Output: I mix and match companies and brands from a small set of companies


Input: [Votes] 402 [%] 48.49 [Option]

Output: I buy from the company whose product or service suits me best at the time


Input: [Votes] 20 [%] 2.41 [Option]

Output: I buy from the company whose product or service that is cheapest


Input: [Votes] 46 [%] 5.55 [Option]

Output: I'm pretty random in my purchasing


Input: [Votes] 102 [%] 12.30 [Option]

Output: I purchase from a variety of companies but specifically avoid 1 or more companies.


Input: [Votes] 13 [%] 1.57 [Option]

Output: Other


Input: [Votes] 827 [%] 100% [Option]

Output: Total


Input: [Sector] Basic materials [4Q '08 Earnings change]

Output: -67%

Warning! Warning! Weak profits ahead - Jan. 8, 2009


Input: [Sector] Consumer discretionary [4Q '08 Earnings change]

Output: -55%

Warning! Warning! Weak profits ahead - Jan. 8, 2009


Input: [Sector] Consumer staples [4Q '08 Earnings change]

Output: +5%

Warning! Warning! Weak profits ahead - Jan. 8, 2009


Input: [Sector] Energy [4Q '08 Earnings change]

Output: -17%

Warning! Warning! Weak profits ahead - Jan. 8, 2009


Input: [Sector] Financials [4Q '08 Earnings change]

Output: -7%

Warning! Warning! Weak profits ahead - Jan. 8, 2009


Input: [Sector] Healthcare [4Q '08 Earnings change]

Output: +6%

Warning! Warning! Weak profits ahead - Jan. 8, 2009


Input: [Sector] Industrials [4Q '08 Earnings change]

Output: -18%

Warning! Warning! Weak profits ahead - Jan. 8, 2009


Input: [Sector] Technology [4Q '08 Earnings change]

Output: -15%

Warning! Warning! Weak profits ahead - Jan. 8, 2009


Input: [Sector] Telecom [4Q '08 Earnings change]

Output: -14%

Warning! Warning! Weak profits ahead - Jan. 8, 2009


Input: [Sector] Utilities [4Q '08 Earnings change]

Output: +4%

Warning! Warning! Weak profits ahead - Jan. 8, 2009


Input: [Information] 7 out of 10 [Measure]

Output: Overall Site Rating

GetItOn.com Review - Review of GetItOn.com | Dating Reviews by HOG


Input: [Information] Very Good [Measure]

Output: Site Look & Feel

GetItOn.com Review - Review of GetItOn.com | Dating Reviews by HOG


Input: [Information] 1 girl to 3 guys [Measure]

Output: Guy to Girl Ratio

GetItOn.com Review - Review of GetItOn.com | Dating Reviews by HOG


Input: [Information] 50 outgoing emails [Measure]

Output: Initiated Contact With

GetItOn.com Review - Review of GetItOn.com | Dating Reviews by HOG


Input: [Information] 11 serious replies [Measure]

Output: Replies Received

GetItOn.com Review - Review of GetItOn.com | Dating Reviews by HOG


Input: [Information] 7 dates (distinct women) [Measure]

Output: Total Resulting Dates

GetItOn.com Review - Review of GetItOn.com | Dating Reviews by HOG


Input: [Information] 5 hookups (distinct women) [Measure]

Output: Total Resulting Hookups

GetItOn.com Review - Review of GetItOn.com | Dating Reviews by HOG


Input: [Information] We didn't have to work very hard to get 'em. However, note that the site stresses SEXUAL COMPATIBILITY, and we used a more toned-down approach to get the girls in the sack. Took a little more tact than our first and second site choices. [Measure]

Output: General Required Effort

GetItOn.com Review - Review of GetItOn.com | Dating Reviews by HOG


Input: [2010] 25.9%

Output: Mobile site

Mastering Internet Marketing in 2010: Results of the 4th Benchmark Survey on Hotel Internet Marketing

What mobile marketing initiatives are you planning for 2010?


Input: [2010] 22.4%

Output: Mobile booking engine

Mastering Internet Marketing in 2010: Results of the 4th Benchmark Survey on Hotel Internet Marketing

What mobile marketing initiatives are you planning for 2010?


Input: [2010] 27.6%

Output: SMS text marketing

Mastering Internet Marketing in 2010: Results of the 4th Benchmark Survey on Hotel Internet Marketing

What mobile marketing initiatives are you planning for 2010?


Input: [2010] 19%

Output: Mobile banner advertising

Mastering Internet Marketing in 2010: Results of the 4th Benchmark Survey on Hotel Internet Marketing

What mobile marketing initiatives are you planning for 2010?


Input: [2010] 24.1%

Output: iPhone app

Mastering Internet Marketing in 2010: Results of the 4th Benchmark Survey on Hotel Internet Marketing

What mobile marketing initiatives are you planning for 2010?


Input: [2010] 32.8%

Output: I am not planning on mobile marketing initiatives for 2010

Mastering Internet Marketing in 2010: Results of the 4th Benchmark Survey on Hotel Internet Marketing

What mobile marketing initiatives are you planning for 2010?


Input: [Percent] 27.7% [0]

Output: Manufacturing

Small Cap Opportunities Fund | Horizon Kinetics


Input: [Percent] 19.2% [0]

Output: Real Estate and Rental and Leasing

Small Cap Opportunities Fund | Horizon Kinetics


Input: [Percent] 14.9% [0]

Output: Finance and Insurance

Small Cap Opportunities Fund | Horizon Kinetics


Input: [Percent] 9.2% [0]

Output: Management of Companies and Enterprises

Small Cap Opportunities Fund | Horizon Kinetics


Input: [Percent] 9.0% [0]

Output: Petroleum and Gas

Small Cap Opportunities Fund | Horizon Kinetics


Input: [Percent] 6.8% [0]

Output: Information

Small Cap Opportunities Fund | Horizon Kinetics


Input: [Percent] 4.5% [0]

Output: Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation

Small Cap Opportunities Fund | Horizon Kinetics


Input: [Percent] 3.8% [0]

Output: Retail Trade

Small Cap Opportunities Fund | Horizon Kinetics


Input: [Percent] 2.3% [0]

Output: Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction

Small Cap Opportunities Fund | Horizon Kinetics


Input: [Percent] 1.3% [0]

Output: Accommodation and Food Services

Small Cap Opportunities Fund | Horizon Kinetics


Input: [Assets] 33.1% [Holdings]

Output: High Yield Fund


Input: [Assets] 23.9% [Holdings]

Output: Short Duration Income Fund


Input: [Assets] 11.3% [Holdings]

Output: International Dividend Income Fund


Input: [Assets] 10.3% [Holdings]

Output: Convertible Fund


Input: [Assets] 9.3% [Holdings]

Output: Emerging Markets Currency Fund


Input: [Assets] 5.1% [Holdings]

Output: Calibrated Mid Cap Value Fund


Input: [Assets] 3.2% [Holdings]

Output: Core Fixed Income Fund


Input: [Assets] 3.1% [Holdings]

Output: Mid Cap Stock Fund


Input: [Assets] 0.6% [Holdings]

Output: Growth Opportunities Fund


Input: [Number of Problems] 460 [Problem Category]

Output: Cruise Control problems

Ford F-150 Accelerator Pedal Problems - part 1


Input: [Number of Problems] 409 [Problem Category]

Output: Vehicle Speed Control problems

Ford F-150 Accelerator Pedal Problems - part 1


Input: [Number of Problems] 62 [Problem Category]

Output: Car Accelerates On Its Own problems

Ford F-150 Accelerator Pedal Problems - part 1


Input: [Number of Problems] 42 [Problem Category]

Output: Accelerator Pedal problems

Ford F-150 Accelerator Pedal Problems - part 1


Input: [Number of Problems] 38 [Problem Category]

Output: Accelerator Stuck problems

Ford F-150 Accelerator Pedal Problems - part 1


Input: [Number of Problems] 16 [Problem Category]

Output: Speed Control Linkage problems

Ford F-150 Accelerator Pedal Problems - part 1


Input: [Number of Problems] 15 [Problem Category]

Output: Speed Control Cable problems

Ford F-150 Accelerator Pedal Problems - part 1


Input: [Number of Problems] 11 [Problem Category]

Output: Car Throttle Stuck problems

Ford F-150 Accelerator Pedal Problems - part 1


Input: [Number of Problems] 4 [Problem Category]

Output: Speed Control Springs problems

Ford F-150 Accelerator Pedal Problems - part 1


Input: [Number of Problems] 3 [Problem Category]

Output: Fail To Accelerate problems

Ford F-150 Accelerator Pedal Problems - part 1


Input: [#] 1 [Reason] Never Boned [Votes] 15 [Vote] Please Login to Vote [Why?]

Output: Still rocks.

Internet, The - BoneTheFish.com (BTF) - Random Topics


Input: [#] 2 [Reason] It became a lifestyle [Votes] 10 [Vote] Please Login to Vote [Why?]

Output: The 'net is awesome but so is the real world

Internet, The - BoneTheFish.com (BTF) - Random Topics


Input: [#] 3 [Reason] Advertising [Votes] 9 [Vote] Please Login to Vote [Why?]

Output: It's becoming too cluttered with it

Internet, The - BoneTheFish.com (BTF) - Random Topics


Input: [#] 4 [Reason] 1990s [Votes] 4 [Vote] Please Login to Vote [Why?]

Output: Critics who blamed TV now blame the Internet!

Internet, The - BoneTheFish.com (BTF) - Random Topics


Input: [#] 5 [Reason] Charging for what was free [Votes] 2 [Vote] Please Login to Vote [Why?]

Output: e.g. Radio broadcasts of out of town MLB games

Internet, The - BoneTheFish.com (BTF) - Random Topics


Input: [#] 6 [Reason] Day 1 [Votes] 1 [Vote] Please Login to Vote [Why?]

Output: Sucked from the start.

Internet, The - BoneTheFish.com (BTF) - Random Topics


Input: [#] 7 [Reason] Too Much Porn [Votes] 1 [Vote] Please Login to Vote [Why?]

Output: The majority of the users have been on the net for

Internet, The - BoneTheFish.com (BTF) - Random Topics


Input: [Lib Dem Policy] Tax threshold to £10K NO [Is it fair?] YES [Does it stimulate demand?]

Output: YES

Opinion: The Conflicts of Economic Policy


Input: [Lib Dem Policy] Top tax rate to 45% NO [Is it fair?] YES [Does it stimulate demand?]

Output: YES

Opinion: The Conflicts of Economic Policy


Input: [Lib Dem Policy] Cut government spending including welfare ? [Is it fair?] NO [Does it stimulate demand?]

Output: VERY MUCH NO

Opinion: The Conflicts of Economic Policy


Input: [Lib Dem Policy] Increase pension contributions/Reduce pensions YES [Is it fair?] ? [Does it stimulate demand?]

Output: VERY MUCH NO

Opinion: The Conflicts of Economic Policy


Input: [Lib Dem Policy] Mansion tax YES [Is it fair?] NO [Does it stimulate demand?]

Output: NO

Opinion: The Conflicts of Economic Policy


Input: [Lib Dem Policy] Reduce rich pensioners benefits YES [Is it fair?] ? [Does it stimulate demand?]

Output: NO

Opinion: The Conflicts of Economic Policy


Input: [Probable Source] Source Unknown 1,110.5 [Probable Source Group]

Output: Unknown

Texas Water Quality Assessment Report | WATERS | US EPA


Input: [Probable Source] Non-Point Source 1,006.9 [Probable Source Group]

Output: Unspecified Nonpoint Source

Texas Water Quality Assessment Report | WATERS | US EPA


Input: [Probable Source] Upstream Source 611.9 [Probable Source Group]

Output: Other

Texas Water Quality Assessment Report | WATERS | US EPA


Input: [Probable Source] Industrial Point Source Discharge 542.2 [Probable Source Group]

Output: Industrial

Texas Water Quality Assessment Report | WATERS | US EPA


Input: [Probable Source] Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers 361.2 [Probable Source Group]

Output: Urban-Related Runoff/Stormwater

Texas Water Quality Assessment Report | WATERS | US EPA


Input: [Probable Source] Municipal Point Source Discharges 43.7 [Probable Source Group]

Output: Municipal Discharges/Sewage

Texas Water Quality Assessment Report | WATERS | US EPA


Input: [Probable Source] Irrigated Crop Production 27.6 [Probable Source Group]

Output: Agriculture

Texas Water Quality Assessment Report | WATERS | US EPA


Input: [Probable Source] Wildlife Other Than Waterfowl 7.0 [Probable Source Group]

Output: Natural/Wildlife

Texas Water Quality Assessment Report | WATERS | US EPA


Input: [Probable Source] Natural Sources 6.6 [Probable Source Group]

Output: Natural/Wildlife

Texas Water Quality Assessment Report | WATERS | US EPA


Input: [0] Factoid/2002/06/03 [FactoidHeadline]

Output: Thank You to the California Coastal Conservancy


Input: [0] Factoid/2002/06/04 [FactoidHeadline]

Output: Delaware's Lax Beach Water Quality Standards


Input: [0] Factoid/2002/06/05 [FactoidHeadline]

Output: Lots of Taxpayers' Money for Beach Sand in FL


Input: [0] Factoid/2002/06/06 [FactoidHeadline]

Output: Lots of Shoreline Armoring in Maine


Input: [0] Factoid/2002/06/10 [FactoidHeadline]

Output: World's Longest Fresh Water Coastline


Input: [0] Factoid/2002/06/11 [FactoidHeadline]

Output: Improving Public Beach Access in NJ


Input: [0] Factoid/2002/06/12 [FactoidHeadline]

Output: No Beach Water Testing for Oregon


Input: [0] Factoid/2002/06/13 [FactoidHeadline]

Output: Public Domain Beach Access in Puerto Rico


Input: [0] Factoid/2002/06/14 [FactoidHeadline]

Output: Oil Dumping Conviction for Ship Captain Sets Precedent


Input: [0] Factoid/2002/06/17 [FactoidHeadline]

Output: Households Willing to Pay to Treat Sewage Properly


Input: [0] Factoid/2002/06/18 [FactoidHeadline]

Output: Orange County, CA Residents Willing to Pay for Secondary Treatment of Sewage


Input: [0] Factoid/2002/06/19 [FactoidHeadline]

Output: Right Whales in Danger from Ships


Input: [0] Factoid/2002/06/20 [FactoidHeadline]

Output: Commercial Tuna and Swordfishers Killing Atlantic White Marlins


Input: [0] Factoid/2002/06/21 [FactoidHeadline]

Output: No Water Bill Without Reform Of Army Corps of Engineers


Input: [0] Factoid/2002/06/24 [FactoidHeadline]

Output: Common Bacteria Found in Humans Is Now Killing Elkhorn Coral


Input: [0] Factoid/2002/06/26 [FactoidHeadline]

Output: Big Sur Coast in Central California Gains Protection


Input: [0] Factoid/2002/06/27 [FactoidHeadline]

Output: At Least 500 Dams Already Removed


Input: [0] Factoid/2002/06/28 [FactoidHeadline]

Output: Alien Seaweed Continues to Threaten Southern California Waters


Input: [Responses] 674 [Percentage] 44.08% [Survey Responses]

Output: Before it was introduced I was apprehensive about it and I still don't like it.

Survey Questions – School of Theology and Seminary


Input: [Responses] 154 [Percentage] 10.07% [Survey Responses]

Output: Before it was introduced I was apprehensive about it but I've changed my mind and I like it.

Survey Questions – School of Theology and Seminary


Input: [Responses] 448 [Percentage] 29.30% [Survey Responses]

Output: Before it was introduced I was looking forward to it and I still like it.

Survey Questions – School of Theology and Seminary


Input: [Responses] 229 [Percentage] 14.98% [Survey Responses]

Output: Before it was introduced I was looking forward to it but I've changed my mind and I don't like it.

Survey Questions – School of Theology and Seminary


Input: [Responses] 24 [Percentage] 1.57% [Survey Responses]

Output: I haven't noticed much difference between this text and the previous one.

Survey Questions – School of Theology and Seminary


Input: [Responses] 1529 [Percentage] 100% [Survey Responses]

Output: Total

Survey Questions – School of Theology and Seminary


Input: [1996] 25% [2001] 30% [2004] 63% [Survey item]

Output: Condom use at last sex with a regular non-marital non-cohabiting partner

Population Services International (PSI) - 2007 review | GiveWell


Input: [1996] 25% [2001] 43% [2004] 68% [Survey item]

Output: Condom use at last sex with a non-regular partner

Population Services International (PSI) - 2007 review | GiveWell


Input: [1996] - [2001] - [2004] 43% [Survey item]

Output: Consistent condom use with a regular non-marital non-cohabiting partner

Population Services International (PSI) - 2007 review | GiveWell


Input: [1996] - [2001] - [2004] 52% [Survey item]

Output: Consistent condom use with a non-regular partner

Population Services International (PSI) - 2007 review | GiveWell


Input: [1996] - [2001] 28% [2004] 59% [Survey item]

Output: Condom use at last sex with a regular partner when the male has 2+ partners

Population Services International (PSI) - 2007 review | GiveWell


Input: [1996] - [2001] 43% [2004] 69% [Survey item]

Output: Condom use at last sex with a non regular partner when the male has 2+ partners

Population Services International (PSI) - 2007 review | GiveWell


Input: [%] 6.5

Output: Very confident, a situation similar to Mid Staffs could never happen at my trust

Full survey results: how will the Francis report affect nursing | News | Nursing Times

17. How confident are you that a similar situation as the care failings at Mid Staffs could never happen at your trust?


Input: [%] 30.4

Output: Fairly confident, a situation similar to Mid Staffs is unlikely to happen at my trust

Full survey results: how will the Francis report affect nursing | News | Nursing Times

17. How confident are you that a similar situation as the care failings at Mid Staffs could never happen at your trust?


Input: [%] 28.0

Output: Don’t know

Full survey results: how will the Francis report affect nursing | News | Nursing Times

17. How confident are you that a similar situation as the care failings at Mid Staffs could never happen at your trust?


Input: [%] 23.2

Output: Not very, we are at risk of a situation similar to Mid Staffs developing

Full survey results: how will the Francis report affect nursing | News | Nursing Times

17. How confident are you that a similar situation as the care failings at Mid Staffs could never happen at your trust?


Input: [%] 7.7

Output: Not at all, it’s already happening in isolated parts of the organisation

Full survey results: how will the Francis report affect nursing | News | Nursing Times

17. How confident are you that a similar situation as the care failings at Mid Staffs could never happen at your trust?


Input: [%] 4.3

Output: Not at all, it’s already happening across the organisation

Full survey results: how will the Francis report affect nursing | News | Nursing Times

17. How confident are you that a similar situation as the care failings at Mid Staffs could never happen at your trust?


Input: [Sectors With Job Gains:] Educational & Health Services* [Change:]

Output: +70,600

Labor Statistics - New York State Department of Labor

Change in Jobs by Major Industry Sector, June 2014 - June 2015


Input: [Sectors With Job Gains:] Professional & Business Services [Change:]

Output: +36,500

Labor Statistics - New York State Department of Labor


Input: [Sectors With Job Gains:] Construction [Change:]

Output: +17,700

Labor Statistics - New York State Department of Labor


Input: [Sectors With Job Gains:] Leisure & Hospitality [Change:]

Output: +16,700

Labor Statistics - New York State Department of Labor


Input: [Sectors With Job Gains:] Other Services [Change:]

Output: +16,700

Labor Statistics - New York State Department of Labor


Input: [Sectors With Job Gains:] Trade, Transportation & Utilities [Change:]

Output: +15,100

Labor Statistics - New York State Department of Labor


Input: [Sectors With Job Gains:] Financial Activities [Change:]

Output: +3,400

Labor Statistics - New York State Department of Labor


Input: [Sectors With Job Gains:] Government* [Change:]

Output: +1,900

Labor Statistics - New York State Department of Labor


Input: [0] 02/11/2013 [2] Article [1]

Output: Pitched Currency War & USDollar Rejection


Input: [0] 12/27/2012 [2] Article [1]

Output: The Coming Isolation of the USDollar


Input: [0] 11/27/2012 [2] Article [1]

Output: Immutable Golden Laws


Input: [0] 10/31/2012 [2] Article [1]

Output: Golden Harp & Allocated Gold Exposure


Input: [0] 10/17/2012 [2] Article [1]

Output: Extreme Symptoms & Hidden Menace


Input: [0] 09/26/2012 [2] Article [1]

Output: Death Knells for the USDollar


Input: [0] 09/06/2012 [2] Article [1]

Output: No CB Solutions: Liquidity vs Insolvency


Input: [0] 08/29/2012 [2] Article [1]

Output: Firestorms & Currency Twisters


Input: [0] 08/02/2012 [2] Article [1]

Output: Conflicts & Pressure Points


Input: [0] 06/27/2012 [2] Article [1]

Output: Outline on Collapse End Game


Input: [0] 06/06/2012 [2] Article [1]

Output: U.S. Treasury Bonds: Black Hole Dynamics


Input: [0] 04/13/2012 [2] Article [1]

Output: Golden Eye of Hurricane


Input: [0] 03/28/2012 [2] Article [1]

Output: The Gold Groundhog Grind


Input: [0] 03/09/2012 [2] Article [1]

Output: Handicapping the Collapse


Input: [0] 02/23/2012 [2] Article [1]

Output: Herding Greek Cats from Bondage


Input: [0] 02/08/2012 [2] Article [1]

Output: The High Cost of 0%


Input: [0] 02/01/2012 [2] Article [1]

Output: Corruption in Fascist Business Model


Input: [0] 01/26/2012 [2] Article [1]

Output: Tail Events, Isolation, New Normal


Input: [0] 01/20/2012 [2] Article [1]

Output: Inflation: The Only Tool Left


Input: [0] 01/11/2012 [2] Article [1]

Output: The U.S. Dollar Paper Tiger


Input: [0] 12/21/2011 [2] Article [1]

Output: COMEX: The March to Irrelevance


Input: [0] 12/15/2011 [2] Article [1]

Output: Pathogenesis of Central Bank Ruin


Input: [0] 11/30/2011 [2] Article [1]

Output: Perpetual Q.E. Without the Billboard


Input: [0] 11/17/2011 [2] Article [1]

Output: Gold & Whirlwind Crisis


Input: [0] 10/26/2011 [2] Article [1]

Output: Gold & Fraudulent Traps


Input: [0] 10/13/2011 [2] Article [1]

Output: Euroland & the Gold Rebound


Input: [0] 10/04/2011 [2] Article [1]

Output: UST Bonds: The Monster Spleen


Input: [0] 09/22/2011 [2] Article [1]

Output: Billboard Signals of Collapse


Input: [0] 09/07/2011 [2] Article [1]

Output: False Comparison to 2008


Input: [0] 08/31/2011 [2] Article [1]

Output: Illusion of Stable Currency Vortex


Input: [Freq.] 146 [Percent] 4.6% [0]

Output: Cypriot your age whom you have recently met


Input: [Freq.] 249 [Percent] 7.8% [0]

Output: Tourist your age whom you have recently met


Input: [Freq.] 434 [Percent] 13.7% [0]

Output: Cypriot your age whom you have known a long time


Input: [Freq.] 195 [Percent] 6.1% [0]

Output: Tourist your age whom you have known a long time


Input: [Freq.] 111 [Percent] 3.5% [0]

Output: Cypriot you had recently met who was much older than you


Input: [Freq.] 132 [Percent] 4.2% [0]

Output: Tourist you had recently met who was much older than you


Input: [Freq.] 118 [Percent] 3.7% [0]

Output: Cypriot you had known a long time who was much older than you


Input: [Freq.] 92 [Percent] 2.9% [0]

Output: Tourist you had known a long time who was much older than you


Input: [Freq.] 216 [Percent] 6.8% [0]

Output: Cypriot prostitute, man or woman, who has sex in return for money


Input: [Freq.] 140 [Percent] 4.4% [0]

Output: Foreign prostitute, man or woman, who has sex in return for money


Input: [Exports % change] -2.9 [Imports % change] +1.0 [0]

Output: Food, beverages and tobacco


Input: [Exports % change] +2.1 [Imports % change] 0.0 [0]

Output: Basic materials


Input: [Exports % change] -4.4 [Imports % change] +4.4 [0]

Output: Semi manufactured goods; of which


Input: [Exports % change] -4.8 [Imports % change] +8.0 [0]

Output: Chemicals


Input: [Exports % change] -3.2 [Imports % change] +1.4 [0]

Output: Semi-manufactured goods other than chemicals


Input: [Exports % change] -3.4 [Imports % change] -0.8 [0]

Output: Finished manufactured goods; of which


Input: [Exports % change] -4.7 [Imports % change] -9.7 [0]

Output: Cars


Input: [Exports % change] -0.3 [Imports % change] +1.8 [0]

Output: Consumer goods other than cars


Input: [Exports % change] -2.7 [Imports % change] +0.4 [0]

Output: Intermediate goods


Input: [Exports % change] -2.5 [Imports % change] 0.0 [0]

Output: Capital goods


Input: [Favor] 88% [Oppose] 11% [No opinion] 1% [Proposal]

Output: (2003) A law requiring doctors to inform patients about alternatives to abortion before performing the procedure

Abortion - CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science


Input: [Favor] 87% [Oppose] 11% [No opinion] 2% [Proposal]

Output: A law requiring doctors inform patients about possible risks of abortion before performing the procedure

Abortion - CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science


Input: [Favor] 71% [Oppose] 27% [No opinion] 2% [Proposal]

Output: A law requiring women under 18 to get parental consent for any abortion

Abortion - CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science


Input: [Favor] 69% [Oppose] 28% [No opinion] 3% [Proposal]

Output: A law requiring women seeking abortions to wait 24 hours before having the procedure done

Abortion - CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science


Input: [Favor] 64% [Oppose] 31% [No opinion] 5% [Proposal]

Output: A law making partial birth abortions illegal except for life of the mother

Abortion - CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science


Input: [Favor] 64% [Oppose] 34% [No opinion] 2% [Proposal]

Output: (2005) A law requiring that the husband of a married woman be notified if she decides to have an abortion

Abortion - CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science


Input: [Favor] 50% [Oppose] 46% [No opinion] 3% [Proposal]

Output: A law requiring women seeking an abortion be shown an ultrasound image of her fetus at least 24 hours before

Abortion - CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science


Input: [Favor] 46% [Oppose] 51% [No opinion] 4% [Proposal]

Output: A law letting pharmacists and health providers opt out of medicine/surgical procedures resulting in abortion

Abortion - CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science


Input: [Favor] 37% [Oppose] 61% [No opinion] 2% [Proposal]

Output: (2005) A constitutional amendment to ban abortion in all circumstances, except to save the life of the mother

Abortion - CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science


Input: [0] GMT [1] Currency [2] Release [3] Survey [4] Previous [5]

Output: Comments

Dollar Drive to 1.0250 Against Aussie Helps Cap EURUSD Below 1.3000 | DailyFX


Input: [0] 1:00 [1] CNY [2] Non-manufacturing PMI [3] - [4] 56.3 [5]

Output: The manufacturing sector is considered far more integral to China’s health, but service sector figures are good measures of domestic vs export considerations

Dollar Drive to 1.0250 Against Aussie Helps Cap EURUSD Below 1.3000 | DailyFX


Input: [0] 1:00 [1] AUD [2] HIA New Home Sales (MoM) [3] - [4] -5.6% [5]

Output: For those that were bearish on Australia before China fears heated up or the RBA cut, a housing bubble was a persistent concern

Dollar Drive to 1.0250 Against Aussie Helps Cap EURUSD Below 1.3000 | DailyFX


Input: [0] 1:30 [1] AUD [2] Trade Balance (Australian dollar) [3] -685M [4] -556M [5]

Output: Strong currency may dampen exports but supportive for cheaper imports.

Dollar Drive to 1.0250 Against Aussie Helps Cap EURUSD Below 1.3000 | DailyFX


Input: [0] 1:30 [1] AUD [2] Retail Sales s.a. (MoM) [3] 0.4% [4] -0.8% [5]

Output: Domestic trends are quickly becoming more important as Chinese data shows a steady cooling

Dollar Drive to 1.0250 Against Aussie Helps Cap EURUSD Below 1.3000 | DailyFX


Input: [0] 7:45 [1] EUR [2] Italian Purchasing Manager Index Services (SEP F) [3] 44.1 [4] 44 [5]

Output: Final readings of service-sector measures rarely produce dramatic changes. However, with the focus on growth and financial health, the market will be more vested in this accurate GDP proxy

Dollar Drive to 1.0250 Against Aussie Helps Cap EURUSD Below 1.3000 | DailyFX


Input: [0] 8:30 [1] GBP [2] Purchasing Manager Index Services (SEP) [3] 53 [4] 53.7 [5]

Output: Unlike Euro-area figures, this UK service reading is our first look, and growth concerns are taking greater precedence over price action

Dollar Drive to 1.0250 Against Aussie Helps Cap EURUSD Below 1.3000 | DailyFX


Input: [0] 8:30 [1] GBP [2] Official Reserves (Changes) [3] - [4] $732M [5]

Output: Following first, three-month increase in reserves since April 2011

Dollar Drive to 1.0250 Against Aussie Helps Cap EURUSD Below 1.3000 | DailyFX


Input: [0] 9:00 [1] EUR [2] Euro-Zone Retail Sales (MoM) [3] -0.1% [4] -0.2% [5]

Output: Retail sales have been down since August 2011.

Dollar Drive to 1.0250 Against Aussie Helps Cap EURUSD Below 1.3000 | DailyFX


Input: [0] 11:00 [1] USD [2] MBA Mortgage Applications [3] - [4] 2.8% [5]

Output: The fixed-rate mortgage rate measured with the last update touched a record low 3.63%

Dollar Drive to 1.0250 Against Aussie Helps Cap EURUSD Below 1.3000 | DailyFX


Input: [0] 12:15 [1] USD [2] ADP Employment Change (SEP) [3] 140K [4] 201K [5]

Output: The ADP figures far outpaced the official NFP figures in the August data. Traders will tread cautiously

Dollar Drive to 1.0250 Against Aussie Helps Cap EURUSD Below 1.3000 | DailyFX


Input: [0] 14:00 [1] USD [2] ISM Non-Manufacturing Composite (SEP) [3] 53.2 [4] 53.7 [5]

Output: Has been posting moderate growth figures since January 2010.

Dollar Drive to 1.0250 Against Aussie Helps Cap EURUSD Below 1.3000 | DailyFX


Input: [0] 14:30 [1] USD [2] DOE U.S. Crude Oil Inventories [3] - [4] -2446K [5]

Output: Volatility in inventory figures still very high following biggest increase in six months two weeks ago.

Dollar Drive to 1.0250 Against Aussie Helps Cap EURUSD Below 1.3000 | DailyFX


Input: [Major] Electrical engineering [Females] +72% [Males]

Output: +63%

Major Premium, Bryan Caplan | EconLog | Library of Economics and Liberty


Input: [Major] Computer Science [Females] +63% [Males]

Output: +61%

Major Premium, Bryan Caplan | EconLog | Library of Economics and Liberty


Input: [Major] Mechanical engineering [Females] +72% [Males]

Output: +61%

Major Premium, Bryan Caplan | EconLog | Library of Economics and Liberty


Input: [Major] Finance [Females] +55% [Males]

Output: +61%

Major Premium, Bryan Caplan | EconLog | Library of Economics and Liberty


Input: [Major] Economics [Females] +59% [Males]

Output: +60%

Major Premium, Bryan Caplan | EconLog | Library of Economics and Liberty


Input: [Major] Accounting [Females] +53% [Males]

Output: +53%

Major Premium, Bryan Caplan | EconLog | Library of Economics and Liberty


Input: [Major] Mathematics [Females] +50% [Males]

Output: +53%

Major Premium, Bryan Caplan | EconLog | Library of Economics and Liberty


Input: [Major] Nursing [Females] +59% [Males]

Output: +52%

Major Premium, Bryan Caplan | EconLog | Library of Economics and Liberty


Input: [Major] Chemistry [Females] +47% [Males]

Output: +48%

Major Premium, Bryan Caplan | EconLog | Library of Economics and Liberty


Input: [Major] General business [Females] +46% [Males]

Output: +46%

Major Premium, Bryan Caplan | EconLog | Library of Economics and Liberty


Input: [Major] Political science/gov't [Females] +47% [Males]

Output: +46%

Major Premium, Bryan Caplan | EconLog | Library of Economics and Liberty


Input: [Major] Biology [Females] +43% [Males]

Output: +44%

Major Premium, Bryan Caplan | EconLog | Library of Economics and Liberty


Input: [Major] Communications [Females] +45% [Males]

Output: +37%

Major Premium, Bryan Caplan | EconLog | Library of Economics and Liberty


Input: [Major] History [Females] +37% [Males]

Output: +35%

Major Premium, Bryan Caplan | EconLog | Library of Economics and Liberty


Input: [Major] Sociology [Females] +36% [Males]

Output: +35%

Major Premium, Bryan Caplan | EconLog | Library of Economics and Liberty


Input: [Major] Liberal arts [Females] +36% [Males]

Output: +34%

Major Premium, Bryan Caplan | EconLog | Library of Economics and Liberty


Input: [Major] English language/lit. [Females] +37% [Males]

Output: +34%

Major Premium, Bryan Caplan | EconLog | Library of Economics and Liberty


Input: [Major] Anthro./archaeology [Females] +36% [Males]

Output: +32%

Major Premium, Bryan Caplan | EconLog | Library of Economics and Liberty


Input: [Major] Fine Arts [Females] +29% [Males]

Output: +25%

Major Premium, Bryan Caplan | EconLog | Library of Economics and Liberty


Input: [Major] General Education [Females] +30% [Males]

Output: +24%

Major Premium, Bryan Caplan | EconLog | Library of Economics and Liberty


Input: [Percent Change] 38.3% [Occupation]

Output: Home health aides

Popular Online Education Programs in Wisconsin | Aboutonlinedegrees.org


Input: [Percent Change] 36.9% [Occupation]

Output: Network systems and data communications analyst

Popular Online Education Programs in Wisconsin | Aboutonlinedegrees.org


Input: [Percent Change] 34% [Occupation]

Output: Personal and home care aides

Popular Online Education Programs in Wisconsin | Aboutonlinedegrees.org


Input: [Percent Change] 31.8% [Occupation]

Output: Financial examiners

Popular Online Education Programs in Wisconsin | Aboutonlinedegrees.org


Input: [Percent Change] 32.1% [Occupation]

Output: Ambulance drivers/attendants, exc. Emergency medical tech

Popular Online Education Programs in Wisconsin | Aboutonlinedegrees.org


Input: [Percent Change] 27.3% [Occupation]

Output: Athletic trainers

Popular Online Education Programs in Wisconsin | Aboutonlinedegrees.org


Input: [Percent Change] 26.9% [Occupation]

Output: Physician assistants

Popular Online Education Programs in Wisconsin | Aboutonlinedegrees.org


Input: [Percent Change] 25.2% [Occupation]

Output: Surgical technologists

Popular Online Education Programs in Wisconsin | Aboutonlinedegrees.org


Input: [Percent Change] 24.6% [Occupation]

Output: Medical equipment repairers

Popular Online Education Programs in Wisconsin | Aboutonlinedegrees.org


Input: [Percent Change] 25% [Occupation]

Output: Physical therapist aides

Popular Online Education Programs in Wisconsin | Aboutonlinedegrees.org


Input: [Hispanics] 51% [African-American] 62%

Output: No withdrawals prior to retirement

Hannity overstated minority support for private accounts | Research | Media Matters for America

Percent opposing private accounts if it meant...


Input: [Hispanics] 64% [African-American] 70%

Output: Lower guaranteed Social Security benefit in retirement

Hannity overstated minority support for private accounts | Research | Media Matters for America

Percent opposing private accounts if it meant...


Input: [Hispanics] 64% [African-American] 71%

Output: Stock market fluctuations could result in decreased money in retirement

Hannity overstated minority support for private accounts | Research | Media Matters for America

Percent opposing private accounts if it meant...


Input: [Hispanics] 66% [African-American] 72%

Output: Workers pay management fees associated with private accounts

Hannity overstated minority support for private accounts | Research | Media Matters for America

Percent opposing private accounts if it meant...


Input: [Hispanics] 57% [African-American] 63%

Output: New government agency created to administer program

Hannity overstated minority support for private accounts | Research | Media Matters for America

Percent opposing private accounts if it meant...


Input: [Hispanics] 64% [African-American] 68%

Output: Diverting some of Social Security payroll taxes means massive new federal debt in order to pay current benefits

Hannity overstated minority support for private accounts | Research | Media Matters for America

Percent opposing private accounts if it meant...


Input: [Hispanics] 58% [African-American] 63%

Output: Market losers will need additional help from government

Hannity overstated minority support for private accounts | Research | Media Matters for America

Percent opposing private accounts if it meant...


Input: [Hispanics] 72% [African-American] 75%

Output: Cuts to your guaranteed Social Security benefits would be so severe that you could not make up the difference with money from your private account

Hannity overstated minority support for private accounts | Research | Media Matters for America

Percent opposing private accounts if it meant...


Input: [Hispanics] 66% [African-American] 70%

Output: Changes to the way benefits are calculated would result in cuts in guaranteed benefits for everyone, not just people who choose to participate in the private accounts program

Hannity overstated minority support for private accounts | Research | Media Matters for America

Percent opposing private accounts if it meant...


Input: [Hispanics] 69% [African-American] 69%

Output: Our children could be confronted with two bills: one for the current shortfall and another to meet an additional shortfall due to private accounts

Hannity overstated minority support for private accounts | Research | Media Matters for America

Percent opposing private accounts if it meant...


Input: [Count] 461 [Percentage] 33.90 [Response]

Output: The program is utterly vital to our national security, and it must continue unabated.

USConstitution.net 2006 Survey Results - The U.S. Constitution Online - USConstitution.net


Input: [Count] 123 [Percentage] 9.04 [Response]

Output: The program should continue in some form, but I think that warrantless wiretaps should only be used in extraordinary circumstances.

USConstitution.net 2006 Survey Results - The U.S. Constitution Online - USConstitution.net


Input: [Count] 157 [Percentage] 11.54 [Response]

Output: The program had good intentions, but our liberties are too important to be left to the executive branch. It should stop and the current scheme under FISA should be used exclusively.

USConstitution.net 2006 Survey Results - The U.S. Constitution Online - USConstitution.net


Input: [Count] 176 [Percentage] 12.94 [Response]

Output: The program is an example of the arrogance of power. It must be stopped now, and the President should apologize for ever authorizing it.

USConstitution.net 2006 Survey Results - The U.S. Constitution Online - USConstitution.net


Input: [Count] 443 [Percentage] 32.57 [Response]

Output: The program is a crime against the American people and the Congress should impeach President Bush over it.

USConstitution.net 2006 Survey Results - The U.S. Constitution Online - USConstitution.net


Input: [Count] 1360 [Percentage] 100.00 [Response]

Output: Total

USConstitution.net 2006 Survey Results - The U.S. Constitution Online - USConstitution.net


Input: [Mothers] 82% [Fathers] 18% [0]

Output: Custodial Parent

Shocking Data on Incarceration of Fathers


Input: [Mothers] 54.9% [Fathers] 30.4% [0]

Output: Custodial Parents Who Have an Order to Receive Child Support

Shocking Data on Incarceration of Fathers


Input: [Mothers] 42% [Fathers] 34.1% [0]

Output: Child Support Orders Received in Full by Each Gender

Shocking Data on Incarceration of Fathers


Input: [Mothers] 58% [Fathers] 65.9% [0]

Output: Percent of Custodial Parents With Orders to Receive Child Support Who Are Owed Arrears

Shocking Data on Incarceration of Fathers


Input: [Mothers] 12% [Fathers] 88% [0]

Output: Gender Breakdown of Payers with Arrears

Shocking Data on Incarceration of Fathers


Input: [Mothers] $5,997 [Fathers] $5,601 [0]

Output: Average Amount of Child Support Ordered to be Received

Shocking Data on Incarceration of Fathers


Input: [Mothers] $2,295 (38% of order) [Fathers] $2,542 (45% of order) [0]

Output: Average Child Support Amounts Not Received by Each Gender

Shocking Data on Incarceration of Fathers


Input: [0] 1-Month -1.95% -1.95% -1.92%

Output: -1.92%


Input: [0] 3-Month +0.27% +0.27% +0.28%

Output: +0.28%


Input: [0] 6-Month +1.21% +1.21% +1.23%

Output: +1.23%


Input: [0] Year-to-date +1.21% +1.21% +1.23%

Output: +1.23%


Input: [0] 1-Year +7.36% +7.36% +7.39%

Output: +7.39%


Input: [0] 3-Year +17.26% +17.26% +17.27%

Output: +17.27%


Input: [0] 5-Year -- -- --


Input: [0] 10-Year -- -- --


Input: [0] Since Inception +16.26% +16.26% +16.55%

Output: +16.55%


Input: [Arenas] 12 [Avg duration (years)] 5.2 [Avg return] -18.3% [Avg S&P] -8.3% [Difference] -10.0% [Industry]

Output: Banking


Input: [Arenas] 2 [Avg duration (years)] 2.8 [Avg return] -39.4% [Avg S&P] -11.4% [Difference] -28.0% [Industry]

Output: Business Services & Supplies


Input: [Arenas] 4 [Avg duration (years)] 8.4 [Avg return] -9.4% [Avg S&P] -3.3% [Difference] -6.1% [Industry]

Output: Consumer Durables


Input: [Arenas] 11 [Avg duration (years)] 8.1 [Avg return] -5.9% [Avg S&P] -5.0% [Difference] -0.9% [Industry]

Output: Financials


Input: [Arenas] 6 [Avg duration (years)] 11.9 [Avg return] 10.6% [Avg S&P] -0.6% [Difference] 11.2% [Industry]

Output: Food, Drink, & Tobacco


Input: [Arenas] 2 [Avg duration (years)] 3.8 [Avg return] -26.0% [Avg S&P] -18.4% [Difference] -7.6% [Industry]

Output: Household Products


Input: [Arenas] 1 [Avg duration (years)] 4.2 [Avg return] -49.5% [Avg S&P] -7.5% [Difference] -42.0% [Industry]

Output: Media


Input: [Arenas] 6 [Avg duration (years)] 9.6 [Avg return] -11.8% [Avg S&P] -4.4% [Difference] -7.4% [Industry]

Output: Oil & Gas


Input: [Arenas] 3 [Avg duration (years)] 11.0 [Avg return] 16.6% [Avg S&P] 5.3% [Difference] 11.3% [Industry]

Output: Retail


Input: [Arenas] 3 [Avg duration (years)] 5.4 [Avg return] -4.2% [Avg S&P] -4.6% [Difference] 0.4% [Industry]

Output: Technology/Hardware


Input: [Arenas] 3 [Avg duration (years)] 6.9 [Avg return] -13.3% [Avg S&P] 9.0% [Difference] -22.3% [Industry]

Output: Technology/Software


Input: [Arenas] 13 [Avg duration (years)] 5.9 [Avg return] -8.1% [Avg S&P] -6.3% [Difference] -1.8% [Industry]

Output: Telecommunications


Input: [Arenas] 3 [Avg duration (years)] 11.8 [Avg return] -4.5% [Avg S&P] 3.1% [Difference] -7.6% [Industry]

Output: Transportation


Input: [Arenas] 69 [Avg duration (years)] 7.5 [Avg return] -9.1% [Avg S&P] -4.5% [Difference] -4.7% [Industry]

Output: Total


Input: [0] 10th percentile [2009–2013]

Output: -4.2%

Raising America’s Pay: Why It’s Our Central Economic Policy Challenge | Economic Policy Institute


Input: [0] 20th percentile [2009–2013]

Output: -6.4%

Raising America’s Pay: Why It’s Our Central Economic Policy Challenge | Economic Policy Institute


Input: [0] 30th percentile [2009–2013]

Output: -5.4%

Raising America’s Pay: Why It’s Our Central Economic Policy Challenge | Economic Policy Institute


Input: [0] 40th percentile [2009–2013]

Output: -4.7%

Raising America’s Pay: Why It’s Our Central Economic Policy Challenge | Economic Policy Institute


Input: [0] 50th percentile [2009–2013]

Output: -3.6%

Raising America’s Pay: Why It’s Our Central Economic Policy Challenge | Economic Policy Institute


Input: [0] 60th percentile [2009–2013]

Output: -3.7%

Raising America’s Pay: Why It’s Our Central Economic Policy Challenge | Economic Policy Institute


Input: [0] 70th percentile [2009–2013]

Output: -3.0%

Raising America’s Pay: Why It’s Our Central Economic Policy Challenge | Economic Policy Institute


Input: [0] 80th percentile [2009–2013]

Output: -1.9%

Raising America’s Pay: Why It’s Our Central Economic Policy Challenge | Economic Policy Institute


Input: [0] 90th percentile [2009–2013]

Output: -0.7%

Raising America’s Pay: Why It’s Our Central Economic Policy Challenge | Economic Policy Institute


Input: [0] 95th percentile [2009–2013]

Output: 1.1%

Raising America’s Pay: Why It’s Our Central Economic Policy Challenge | Economic Policy Institute


Input: [Percent Rated #1] 45% 84% [0]

Output: To be able to get a better job

New Freshmen Survey - Office of Institutional Research & Assessment - University of Wisconsin - Green Bay


Input: [Percent Rated #1] 20% 71% [0]

Output: To learn about things that interest me

New Freshmen Survey - Office of Institutional Research & Assessment - University of Wisconsin - Green Bay


Input: [Percent Rated #1] 11% 50% [0]

Output: To prepare for graduate or professional school

New Freshmen Survey - Office of Institutional Research & Assessment - University of Wisconsin - Green Bay


Input: [Percent Rated #1] 10% 63% [0]

Output: To gain a general education

New Freshmen Survey - Office of Institutional Research & Assessment - University of Wisconsin - Green Bay


Input: [Percent Rated #1] 9% 58% [0]

Output: To be able to make more money

New Freshmen Survey - Office of Institutional Research & Assessment - University of Wisconsin - Green Bay


Input: [Percent Rated #1] 2% 17% [0]

Output: To get away from home

New Freshmen Survey - Office of Institutional Research & Assessment - University of Wisconsin - Green Bay


Input: [Percent Rated #1] 1% 10% [0]

Output: My parents wanted me to go

New Freshmen Survey - Office of Institutional Research & Assessment - University of Wisconsin - Green Bay


Input: [1] +8.0% [3] +1.0% [0]

Output: Agriculture

Latest Industry Job Trends | Simply Hired


Input: [1] +14.6% [3] -5.8% [0]

Output: Automotive

Latest Industry Job Trends | Simply Hired


Input: [1] +4.8% [3] +40.8% [0]

Output: Construction

Latest Industry Job Trends | Simply Hired


Input: [1] +2.2% [3] +3.0% [0]

Output: Education

Latest Industry Job Trends | Simply Hired


Input: [1] +11.9% [3] +44.9% [0]

Output: Financial Services

Latest Industry Job Trends | Simply Hired


Input: [1] +24.6% [3] +66.6% [0]

Output: Government

Latest Industry Job Trends | Simply Hired


Input: [1] +13.7% [3] +1.3% [0]

Output: Healthcare

Latest Industry Job Trends | Simply Hired


Input: [1] +16.1% [3] -4.3% [0]

Output: Hospitality

Latest Industry Job Trends | Simply Hired


Input: [1] +14.5% [3] -19.9% [0]

Output: Legal

Latest Industry Job Trends | Simply Hired


Input: [1] +10.7% [3] +34.6% [0]

Output: Manufacturing

Latest Industry Job Trends | Simply Hired


Input: [1] +19.2% [3] +15.5% [0]

Output: Media

Latest Industry Job Trends | Simply Hired


Input: [1] +1.4% [3] +22.7% [0]

Output: Military

Latest Industry Job Trends | Simply Hired


Input: [1] -18.1% [3] -3.0% [0]

Output: Non-profit

Latest Industry Job Trends | Simply Hired


Input: [1] +8.7% [3] +26.3% [0]

Output: Real Estate

Latest Industry Job Trends | Simply Hired


Input: [1] +17.1% [3] +16.3% [0]

Output: Retail

Latest Industry Job Trends | Simply Hired


Input: [1] +7.0% [3] -4.0% [0]

Output: Technology

Latest Industry Job Trends | Simply Hired


Input: [1] +8.7% [3] +277.1% [0]

Output: Transportation

Latest Industry Job Trends | Simply Hired


Input: [1] +13.4% [3] +39.1% [0]

Output: Travel

Latest Industry Job Trends | Simply Hired


Input: [Votes] 13 [2] 8.6% [Choice]

Output: Yes, it's essential that I use it!


Input: [Votes] 8 [2] 5.3% [Choice]

Output: Sometimes I use it, but it's only for simple math


Input: [Votes] 6 [2] 3.9% [Choice]

Output: No, but I bring my calculator to my job


Input: [Votes] 10 [2] 6.6% [Choice]

Output: I don't have a job, but I'm using my calculator in a summer class


Input: [Votes] 4 [2] 2.6% [Choice]

Output: I have a job, but I'm ONLY using my calculator in a summer class


Input: [Votes] 69 [2] 45.4% [Choice]

Output: I don't have a job, I'm not taking a class, BUT I am using my calculator!


Input: [Votes] 42 [2] 27.6% [Choice]

Output: My calculator is slowly collecting dust


Input: [CATEGORY] Public safety [2010] Fair [2012] Poor [2014] Poor [2008]

Output: Poor

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] Violent crime ranking [2010] 17th [2012] 12th [2014] 14th [2008]

Output: 10th

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] Incarceration ranking [2010] 19th [2012] 17th [2014] 23rd [2008]

Output: 11th

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] Poverty [2010] Poor [2012] Poor [2014] Poor [2008]

Output: Poor

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] Poverty ranking [2010] 35th [2012] 35th [2014] 36th [2008]

Output: 42nd

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] Population trends [2010] Poor [2012] Poor [2014] Poor [2008]

Output: Poor

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] Population ranking [2010] 8th [2012] 8th [2014] 9th [2008]

Output: 8th

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] Persons gained/lost [2010] –86K [2012] –1K [2014] +7K [2008]

Output: -46K

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] Public health [2010] Fair [2012] Fair [2014] Fair [2008]

Output: Fair

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] Active physicians [2010] 25th [2012] 23rd [2014] 18th [2008]

Output: 27th

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] Insurance coverage [2010] 14th [2012] 15th [2014] 17th [2008]

Output: 12th

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] Infant mortality [2010] 38th [2012] 36th [2014] 37th [2008]

Output: 44th

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] Tobacco use [2010] 36th [2012] 34th [2014] 41st [2008]

Output: 39th

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] Diabetes [2010] 35th [2012] 39th [2014] 30th [2008]

Output: 41st

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] Obesity [2010] 35th [2012] 44th [2014] 46th [2008]

Output: 45th

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] Exercise [2010] 29th [2012] 24th [2014] 16th [2008]

Output: 27th

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] Home ownership [2010] Good [2012] Good [2014] Good [2008]

Output: Good

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] Home ownership ranking [2010] 4th [2012] 6th [2014] 6th [2008]

Output: 2nd

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] Infrastructure [2010] Poor [2012] Poor [2014] Poor [2008]

Output: Poor

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] Roads in poor condition [2010] 37% [2012] 37% [2014] 38% [2008]

Output: 38%

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] Bridges in poor condition [2010] 30% [2012] 30% [2014] 28% [2008]

Output: 28%

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] Arts and Culture [2010] Poor [2012] Poor [2014] Poor [2008]

Output: Poor

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] NEA grants ranking [2010] 15th [2012] 17th [2014] 16th [2008]

Output: 16th

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] Capita ranking [2010] 30th [2012] 47th [2014] 33rd [2008]

Output: 33rd

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] Environment [2010] Poor [2012] Good [2014] Fair [2008]

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] Renewable energy ranking [2010] 22nd [2012] 21st [2014] 25th [2008]

Output: 16th

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] Energy use ranking [2010] 12th [2012] 11th [2014] 15th [2008]

Output: 10th

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] Forested area ranking [2010] 12th [2012] 12th [2014] 12th [2008]

Output: 11th

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] Greenhouse gas emissions [2010] 29th [2012] 30th [2014] 28th [2008]

Output: 28th

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] Toxic chemicals released [2010] 36th [2012] 36th [2014] 38th [2008]

Output: 33rd

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [CATEGORY] State enviromental report [2010] N/A [2012] good [2014] good [2008]

Bridge • The Center for Michigan : 2013 Michigan Scorecard


Input: [Total] of the parent [Non-controlling] shareholders [Non-controlling_3] shareholders [4] Total equity [0]

Output: Rm

Nedbank Audited Financial Results for the year ended 31 December 2011


Input: [Total] 39 649 [Non-controlling] 1 849 [Non-controlling_3] 3 486 [4] 44 984 [0]

Output: Balance at 31 December 2009

Nedbank Audited Financial Results for the year ended 31 December 2011


Input: [Total] (2 042) [Non-controlling] (8) [4] (2 050) [0]

Output: Dividend to shareholders

Nedbank Audited Financial Results for the year ended 31 December 2011


Input: [Total] (5) [Non-controlling_3] (281) [4] (286) [0]

Output: Preference share dividend

Nedbank Audited Financial Results for the year ended 31 December 2011


Input: [Total] 2 283 [Non-controlling_3] 92 [4] 2 375 [0]

Output: Issues of shares net of expenses

Nedbank Audited Financial Results for the year ended 31 December 2011


Input: [Total] (476) [4] (476) [0]

Output: Shares acquired/cancelled by group entities and BEE trusts

Nedbank Audited Financial Results for the year ended 31 December 2011


Input: [Total] (13) [Non-controlling] 13 [4]  [0]

Output: Dilution of shareholding in subsidiary

Nedbank Audited Financial Results for the year ended 31 December 2011


Input: [Total] 4 734 [Non-controlling] 59 [Non-controlling_3] 266 [4] 5 059 [0]

Output: Total comprehensive income for the year

Nedbank Audited Financial Results for the year ended 31 December 2011


Input: [Total] (4) [4] (4) [0]

Output: Liquidation of subsidiaries

Nedbank Audited Financial Results for the year ended 31 December 2011


Input: [Non-controlling] 2 [4] 2 [0]

Output: Additional capitalisation of subsidiaries

Nedbank Audited Financial Results for the year ended 31 December 2011


Input: [Total] 70 [4] 70 [0]

Output: Share-based payment reserve movement

Nedbank Audited Financial Results for the year ended 31 December 2011


Input: [Total] (91) [Non-controlling] (1 762) [Non-controlling_3] (3) [4] (1 856) [0]

Output: Buyout of non-controlling interests

Nedbank Audited Financial Results for the year ended 31 December 2011


Input: [Total] (3) [4] (3) [0]

Output: Regulatory risk reserve provision

Nedbank Audited Financial Results for the year ended 31 December 2011


Input: [Total] (1) [4] (1) [0]

Output: Other movements

Nedbank Audited Financial Results for the year ended 31 December 2011


Input: [Total] 44 101 [Non-controlling] 153 [Non-controlling_3] 3 560 [4] 47 814 [0]

Output: Balance at 31 December 2010

Nedbank Audited Financial Results for the year ended 31 December 2011


Input: [Total] (2 608) [Non-controlling] (11) [4] (2 619) [0]

Output: Dividend to shareholders

Nedbank Audited Financial Results for the year ended 31 December 2011


Input: [Total] (310) [4] (310) [0]

Output: Dividend in respect of BEE transaction

Nedbank Audited Financial Results for the year ended 31 December 2011


Input: [Non-controlling_3] (281) [4] (281) [0]

Output: Preference share dividend

Nedbank Audited Financial Results for the year ended 31 December 2011


Input: [Total] 323 [4] 323 [0]

Output: Issues of shares net of expenses

Nedbank Audited Financial Results for the year ended 31 December 2011


Input: [Total] 95 [4] 95 [0]

Output: Shares acquired/cancelled by group entities and BEE trusts

Nedbank Audited Financial Results for the year ended 31 December 2011


Input: [Total] 6 879 [Non-controlling] 40 [Non-controlling_3] 281 [4] 7 200 [0]

Output: Total comprehensive income for the year

Nedbank Audited Financial Results for the year ended 31 December 2011


Input: [Total] 446 [4] 446 [0]

Output: Share-based payment reserve movement

Nedbank Audited Financial Results for the year ended 31 December 2011


Input: [Total] 11 [Non-controlling] (11) [4]  [0]

Output: Dilution of shareholding in subsidiary

Nedbank Audited Financial Results for the year ended 31 December 2011


Input: [Non-controlling] 7 [Non-controlling_3] 1 [4] 8 [0]

Output: Aquisition of subsidiary

Nedbank Audited Financial Results for the year ended 31 December 2011


Input: [Total] 9 [4] 9 [0]

Output: Other movements

Nedbank Audited Financial Results for the year ended 31 December 2011


Input: [Total] 48 946 [Non-controlling] 178 [Non-controlling_3] 3 561 [4] 52 685 [0]

Output: Balance at 31 December 2011

Nedbank Audited Financial Results for the year ended 31 December 2011


Input: [Votes] 23 [Suggestion] allow potential service consumers to limit their usage authorization request to only the less sensitive resources [Status]

Output: acknowledged

UW Service Registry - Financial Web Service


Input: [Votes] 6 [Suggestion] For budget search show the expiration date on the search results rather than just details [Status]

Output: declined

UW Service Registry - Financial Web Service


Input: [Votes] 3 [Suggestion] make it easy to find/access UW travel visa card account for faculty [Status]

Output: declined

UW Service Registry - Financial Web Service


Input: [Votes] 1 [Suggestion] Add financial transaction data to FWS [Status]

Output: acknowledged

UW Service Registry - Financial Web Service


Input: [Votes] 1 [Suggestion] Add BGT information to FWS [Status]

Output: acknowledged

UW Service Registry - Financial Web Service


Input: [Votes] 1 [Suggestion] On the beta version “budget lookup” page on MyFD, there are some other pieces of data that would be [Status]

Output: declined

UW Service Registry - Financial Web Service


Input: [Votes] 1 [Suggestion] UW Po #/Requisition # - find associated budget # [Status]

Output: acknowledged

UW Service Registry - Financial Web Service


Input: [Votes] 1 [Suggestion] In budget search, have an option to show budgets in children org codes [Status]

Output: declined

UW Service Registry - Financial Web Service


Input: [Percent] 27% [Type of Service]

Output: Restoration Services

Department of Assistive and Rehabilitative Services (DARS) Annual Report 2011

DBS VR Expenditures by Type of Service* (Click table to return to graph view.)


Input: [Percent] 24% [Type of Service]

Output: Assistive Technology & Adaptive Equipment

Department of Assistive and Rehabilitative Services (DARS) Annual Report 2011


Input: [Percent] 15% [Type of Service]

Output: All Other Training

Department of Assistive and Rehabilitative Services (DARS) Annual Report 2011


Input: [Percent] 12% [Type of Service]

Output: Diagnostics & Evaluation

Department of Assistive and Rehabilitative Services (DARS) Annual Report 2011


Input: [Percent] 7% [Type of Service]

Output: Orientation & Mobility Training

Department of Assistive and Rehabilitative Services (DARS) Annual Report 2011


Input: [Percent] 5% [Type of Service]

Output: Consumer Maintenance & Transportation

Department of Assistive and Rehabilitative Services (DARS) Annual Report 2011


Input: [Percent] 10% [Type of Service]

Output: All Other Goods & Services**

Department of Assistive and Rehabilitative Services (DARS) Annual Report 2011


Input: [Very Important] 80% [0]

Output: Banking online saves me time


Input: [Very Important] 62% [0]

Output: I can do my banking when it is convenient for me


Input: [Very Important] 44% [0]

Output: Control over finances


Input: [Very Important] 26% [0]

Output: Availability of information


Input: [Very Important] 23% [0]

Output: Saving money


Input: [Very Important] 21% [0]

Output: More bank services available online


Input: [Very Important] 18% [0]

Output: Can do my banking in private


Input: [Millennials] 34% [Boomers] 19% [0]

Output: I feel very secure when shopping online


Input: [Millennials] 62 [Boomers] 77 [0]

Output: I’m worried about becoming a victim of online fraud


Input: [Millennials] 50 [Boomers] 41 [0]

Output: I take online security into account when using an online merchant


Input: [Millennials] 60 [Boomers] 44 [0]

Output: I engage in mobile payments because of convenience


Input: [Millennials] 60 [Boomers] 25 [0]

Output: I have used a mobile payment option on my smartphone


Input: [Millennials] 40 [Boomers] 26 [0]

Output: I believe fraud risk to be lower when using a smartphone vs. a computer


Output: Source: ThreatMetrix


Input: [Nationwide] 2.1% [Los Angeles] -6.0% [Crime]

Output: Homicide

LAPD Announces Crime Down Again in 2005 - Los Angeles Police Department


Input: [Nationwide] -4.7% [Los Angeles] -16.3% [Crime]

Output: Rape

LAPD Announces Crime Down Again in 2005 - Los Angeles Police Department


Input: [Nationwide] 0.6% [Los Angeles] -4.1% [Crime]

Output: Robbery

LAPD Announces Crime Down Again in 2005 - Los Angeles Police Department


Input: [Nationwide] -0.7% [Los Angeles] -40.0% [Crime]

Output: Aggravated Assault

LAPD Announces Crime Down Again in 2005 - Los Angeles Police Department


Input: [Nationwide] -0.5% [Los Angeles] -26.8% [Crime]

Output: Violent Crime

LAPD Announces Crime Down Again in 2005 - Los Angeles Police Department