\section{Introduction}

Gravity-capillary surface wave packets are described by the
Davey--Stewartson (DS) system \cite{DS} which is integrable by
inverse scattering tranform in the limit of shallow water
\cite{AC}. In this paper, we study the focusing DSII equation
which can be written in a complex form,
\begin{eqnarray}
\nonumber i u_t + u_{zz} + u_{\bar{z} \bar{z}} +
4 ( g + \bar{g} ) u & = & 0, \\
\label{compl} 2 g_{\bar{z}} - \left( |u|^2 \right)_{z} & = & 0,
\end{eqnarray}
where $z = x + i y$, $\bar{z} = x - i y$, $u(z,\bar{z},t)$ and
$g(z,\bar{z},t)$ are complex functions. This equation appears
as the compatibility condition for the two-dimensional Dirac system,
\begin{equation}
\label{Dir}
\varphi_{1 \bar{z}} = - u \varphi_2, \;\;\;\;
\varphi_{2 z} = \bar{u} \varphi_1,
\end{equation}
coupled to the equations for the time evolution of the eigenfunctions,
\begin{eqnarray}
\nonumber i \varphi_{1 t} + \varphi_{1 zz} + u \varphi_{2 \bar{z}}
- u_{\bar{z}} \varphi_2 + 4 g \varphi_1 & = & 0, \\ \label{temp}
- i \varphi_{2 t} + \varphi_{2 \bar{z} \bar{z}} + \bar{u}_z
\varphi_1 - \bar{u} \varphi_{1 z} + 4 \bar{g} \varphi_2 & = & 0.
\end{eqnarray}

The DSII equation was solved formally through the $\bar{\partial}$
problem of complex analysis by Fokas and Ablowitz \cite{FA} and
Beals and Coifman \cite{BC}. Rigorous results on existence and
uniqueness of solutions of the initial-value problem were established
under a small-norm assumption \cite{FS}. The small-norm assumption
was used to eliminate homogeneous solutions of equations of the
inverse scattering which correspond to bound states and radially
symmetric localized waves (lumps) of the DSII equation. When the
potential in the linear system becomes weakly localized (in $L^2$
but not in $L^1$), homogeneous solutions may exist and the analysis
developed in Ref. \cite{FS} is not applicable.

The lump solutions were included formally in \cite{FA}, where their
weak decay rate was found, $u \sim {\rm O}(R^{-1})$ as $R =
\sqrt{x^2 + y^2} \to \infty$. This result is only valid for
complexified solutions of the DSII equation (when $|u|^2$ is
considered to be complex). The reality conditions were incorporated
in the work of Arkadiev et al. \cite{APP} where lumps were
shown to decay like $u \sim {\rm O}(R^{-2})$. Multi-lump solutions
were expressed as a ratio of two determinants \cite{APP}, or, in
a special case, as a ratio of two polynomials \cite{APP2} but their
dynamical role was left out of consideration.

Recently, structural instability of a single lump of the DSII equation
was reported by Gadyl'shin and Kiselev \cite{GK1,GK2}. The authors used
methods of perturbation theory based on completeness of {\em squared}
eigenfunctions of the Dirac system \cite{K1,K2}. A similar conclusion
was announced by Yurov who studied Darboux transformation of the
Dirac system \cite{Yu1,Yu2}.

In this paper, we present an alternative solution of the problem
of stability of multi-lump solutions of the DSII equation. The approach
generalizes our recent work on spectral decomposition of a linear
time-dependent Schr\"{o}dinger equation with weakly localized
(not in $L^1$) potentials \cite{PS}. We find a new spectral
decomposition in terms of {\em single} eigenfunctions of the
Dirac system. Surprisely enough, the two-component Dirac system in
two dimensions has a scalar spectral decomposition. In contrast,
we recall that the Dirac system in one dimension (the so-called AKNS
system) has a well-known 2 x 2 matrix spectral decomposition \cite{AKNS}.

Using the scalar spectral decomposition, we associate the multi-lump
potentials with eigenvalues embedded into a two-dimensional essential
spectrum of the Dirac system. Eigenvalues embedded into a
one-dimensional essential spectrum occur for instance for the
time-dependent Schr\"{o}dinger problem \cite{PS,SW}. They were found
to be structurally unstable under a small variation of the potential.
Depending on the sign of the variation, they either disappear or
become resonant poles in the complex spectral plane which
correspond to lump solutions of the KPI equation \cite{PS}.

For the Dirac system in two dimensions, the multi-lump potentials and
embedded eigenvalues are more exotic. The discrete spectrum of the
Dirac system is separated from the continuous spectrum contribution
in the sense that the spectral data satisfy certain
constraints near the embedded eigenvalues. These constraints are
met for special solutions of the DSII equation such as lumps, but
may not be satisfied for a generic combination of lumps and radiative
waves. As a result, embedded eigenvalues of the Dirac system generally
disappear under a local disturbance of the initial data. Physically,
this implies that a localized initial data of the DSII equation decays
into radiation except for the cases where the data reduce to special
solutions such as lumps.

The paper is organized as follows. Elements of inverse scattering
for the Dirac system are reviewed in Section 2, where we find that
the discrete spectrum of the Dirac system is prescribed by certain
constraints on the spectral data. Spectral decomposition is described
in Section 3 with the proof of orthogonality and completeness relations
through a proper adjoint problem. The perturbation theory for lumps
is developed in Section 4 where some of previous results \cite{GK1,GK2}
are recovered. Section 5 contains concluding remarks. Appendix A
provides a summary of formulas of the complex $\bar{\partial}$-analysis
used in proofs of Section 3.

\section{Spectral Data and Inverse Scattering}

Here we review some results on the Dirac system (\ref{Dir}) and
discard henceforth the time dependence of $u$, $g$ and
\mbox{\boldmath $\varphi$}. The potential $u(z,\bar{z})$ is
assumed to be non-integrable ($u \notin L^1$) with the boundary
conditions, $u \sim {\rm O}(|z|^{-2})$ as $|z| \to \infty$.

\subsection{Essential Spectrum of the Dirac System}

We define the fundamental matrix solution of Eq. (\ref{Dir})
in the form \cite{APP},
\begin{equation} \label{fund}
\mbox{\boldmath $\varphi$} = \left[ \mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}
(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k}) e^{ikz}, \;\;\; \mbox{\boldmath $\chi$}
(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k}) e^{- i \bar{k}\bar{z}} \right],
\end{equation}
where $k$ is a spectral parameter,
$\mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})$ and
$\mbox{\boldmath $\chi$}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})$ satisfy the  system,
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{Dir1}
\mu_{1 \bar{z}} & = & - u \mu_2, \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;
\mu_{2 z} = - i k \mu_2 + \bar{u} \mu_1, \\
\label{Dir2}
\chi_{1 \bar{z}} & = & i \bar{k} \chi_1 - u \chi_2, \;\;\;\;
\chi_{2 z} = \bar{u} \chi_1.
\end{eqnarray}
It follows from Eqs. (\ref{Dir1}) and (\ref{Dir2}) that \mbox{\boldmath
$\mu$} and \mbox{\boldmath $\chi$} are related by the symmetry constraint,
\begin{equation}
\label{chi}
\mbox{\boldmath $\chi$}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k}) = \mbox{\boldmath $\sigma$}
\mbox{\boldmath $\bar{\mu}$}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k}), \;\;\;\;\;\;\;
\mbox{\boldmath $\sigma$} = \left( \begin{array}{cc} 0 & -1 \\
1 & 0 \end{array} \right).
\end{equation}
We impose the boundary conditions for $\mbox{\boldmath
$\mu$}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})$,
\begin{equation}
\label{limit}
\lim_{|k| \to \infty} \mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})
= {\bf e}_1 = \left( \begin{array}{cc} 1 \\ 0 \end{array} \right).
\end{equation}
Solutions of Eq. (\ref{Dir1}) with boundary conditions (\ref{limit})
can be expressed through the Green's functions as Fredholm's
inhomogeneous integral equations \cite{FA,BC},
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{mu1}
\mu_1(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k}) & = & 1 - \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int\!\!\int
\frac{d z' \wedge d \bar{z}'}{z' - z} (u \mu_2 )(z',\bar{z}'), \\
\label{mu2} \mu_2(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k}) & = & \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int\!\!\int
\frac{d z' \wedge d \bar{z}'}{\bar{z}' - \bar{z}}
(\bar{u} \mu_1 )(z',\bar{z}') e^{- i k(z-z') -
i \bar{k} (\bar{z} - \bar{z}')}.
\end{eqnarray}

Values of $k$ for which the homogeneous system associated to Eqs.
(\ref{mu1}) and (\ref{mu2}) has bounded solutions are called
{\em eigenvalues} of the discrete spectrum of the Dirac system.
Let us suppose  that the homogeneous solutions (eigenvalues) are not
supported by the potential $u(z,\bar{z})$. We evaluate the departure
from analyticity of \mbox{\boldmath $\mu$} in the $k$ plane by
calculating the  derivative $\partial \mbox{\boldmath $\mu$} /
\partial \bar{k}$ directly from the system (\ref{mu1})-(\ref{mu2})
\cite{FA} as
\begin{equation}
\label{d-bar}
\frac{\partial \mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}}{\partial \bar{k}} =
b(k,\bar{k}) {\bf N}_{\mu} (z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k}).
\end{equation}
Here $b(k,\bar{k})$ is the spectral data,
\begin{equation}
\label{b}
b(k,\bar{k}) = \frac{1}{2 \pi} \int\!\!\int dz \wedge d \bar{z}
\left( \bar{u} \mu_1 \right)(z,\bar{z}) e^{i(kz + \bar{k} \bar{z})},
\end{equation}
and ${\bf N}_{\mu}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})$ is a solution of Eq. (\ref{Dir1})
which is linearly independent of $\mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}(z,\bar{z},
k,\bar{k})$ and satisfies the boundary condition,
\begin{equation}
\label{N_m}
\lim_{|k| \to \infty} {\bf N}_{\mu}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})
e^{i(kz + \bar{k} \bar{z})} = {\bf e}_2 =
\left( \begin{array}{cc} 0 \\ 1 \end{array} \right).
\end{equation}
This solution can be expressed through the Fredholm's inhomogeneous
equations,
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{Nmu1}
N_{1 \mu}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k}) & = & \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int\!\!\int
\frac{d z' \wedge d \bar{z}'}{z' - z} (u N_{2 \mu} )(z',\bar{z}'), \\
\label{Nmu2} N_{2 \mu}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k}) & = & e^{-i(kz+\bar{k}\bar{z})}
+ \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int\!\!\int \frac{d z' \wedge d \bar{z}'}{\bar{z}'
- \bar{z}} (\bar{u} N_{1 \mu} )(z',\bar{z}') e^{- i k(z-z') -
i \bar{k} (\bar{z} - \bar{z}')}.
\end{eqnarray}
The following reduction formula \cite{FA} connects ${\bf N}_{\mu}
(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})$ and \mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}$(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})$,
\begin{equation}
\label{N_2}
{\bf N}_{\mu}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k}) = \mbox{\boldmath
$\chi$}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k}) e^{-i(kz+\bar{k} \bar{z})}
= \mbox{\boldmath $\sigma$} \bar{\mbox{\boldmath
$\mu$}}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k}) e^{-i(kz + \bar{k} \bar{z})}.
\end{equation}

If the potential $u(z,\bar{z})$ has the boundary values $u \sim
{\rm O}(|z|^{-2})$ as $|z| \to \infty$, ($u \notin L^1$), then,
the integral kernel in Eq. (\ref{b}) is not absolutely integrable,
while Eqs. (\ref{mu1}) and (\ref{mu2}) are still well-defined. We
specify complex integration in the $z$-plane of a non-absolutely
integrable function $f(z,\bar{z})$ according to the formula,
\begin{equation}
\label{comp_integr}
\int\!\!\int dz \wedge d\bar{z} f(z,\bar{z}) = \lim_{R \to \infty}
\int\!\!\int_{|z| \leq R} dz \wedge d \bar{z} f(z,\bar{z}).
\end{equation}
The same formula is valid for integrating eigenfunctions of the Dirac
system in the $k$ plane as well. In Section 3, we use (\ref{comp_integr})
when computing the inner products and completeness relations for the
Dirac system and its adjoint.

\subsection{The Discrete Spectrum}

Suppose here that integral equations (\ref{mu1}) and (\ref{mu2}) have
homogeneous solutions at an eigenvalue $k = k_j$. The discrete spectrum
associated to multi-lump potentials was introduced in Refs. \cite{FA,APP}.
Here we review their approach and give a new result (Proposition 2.1)
which clarifies the role of discrete spectrum in the spectral problem
(\ref{Dir1}).

For the discrete spectrum associated to the multi-lump potentials, an
isolated eigenvalue $k = k_j$ has double multiplicity with the
corresponding two bound states ${\bf \Phi}_j(z,\bar{z})$ and
${\bf \Phi}'_j(z,\bar{z})$ \cite{APP}. The bound state
${\bf \Phi}_j(z,\bar{z})$ is a solution of the homogeneous equations,
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{hom1}
\Phi_{1j}(z,\bar{z}) & = & - \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int \int
\frac{d z' \wedge d \bar{z}'}{z' - z} (u \Phi_{2 j} )(z',\bar{z}'), \\
\label{hom2}
\Phi_{2j}(z,\bar{z}) & = & \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int \int
\frac{d z' \wedge d \bar{z}'}{\bar{z}' - \bar{z}}
(\bar{u} \Phi_{1j} )(z',\bar{z}') e^{- i k_j(z-z') -
i \bar{k}_j (\bar{z} - \bar{z}')},
\end{eqnarray}
with the boundary conditions as $|z| \to \infty$,
\begin{equation}
\label{bound}
{\bf \Phi}_j(z,\bar{z}) \rightarrow \frac{{\bf e}_1}{z}.
\end{equation}
Equivalently, this boundary condition can be written as
renormalization conditions for Eqs. (\ref{hom1}) and (\ref{hom2}),
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{norm1}
\frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int\!\!\int d z \wedge d \bar{z}
(u \Phi_{2j} )(z,\bar{z}) & = & 1, \\
\label{norm2}
\frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int\!\!\int d z \wedge d \bar{z} (\bar{u}
\Phi_{1j} )(z,\bar{z}) e^{i (k_j z + \bar{k}_j \bar{z})} & = & 0.
\end{eqnarray}
The other (degenerate) bound state ${\bf \Phi}_j'(z,\bar{z})$ can be
expressed in terms of ${\bf \Phi}_j(z,\bar{z})$ using Eq. (\ref{N_2}),
\begin{equation}
\label{symmetr}
{\bf \Phi}_j'(z,\bar{z}) = \mbox{\boldmath $\sigma$}
\bar{\bf \Phi}_j(z,\bar{z}) e^{-i(k_j z + \bar{k}_j \bar{z})}.
\end{equation}

The behaviour of the eigenfunction $\mbox{\boldmath
$\mu$}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})$ near the eigenvalue $k = k_j$ becomes
complicated due to the fact that the double eigenvalue is embedded
into the two-dimensional essential spectrum of the Dirac system
(\ref{Dir1}). We prove the following result. \\

{\bf Proposition 2.1.} For smooth data $b(k,\bar{k}) \in C^1$ at
$k \neq k_j$, the eigenfunction $\mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}(z,\bar{z},
k,\bar{k})$ has a pole singularity at $k \to k_j$ only if
\begin{equation}
\label{constraint}
b_0 = \frac{1}{2 \pi} \int\!\!\int dz \wedge d \bar{z} \; \left(
\bar{z} \bar{u} \Phi_{1j} \right)(z,\bar{z}) \;
e^{i(k_j z + \bar{k}_j \bar{z})} = 0.
\end{equation}
\\

{\em Proof.} Suppose $\mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})$
has a pole singularity at $k = k_j$. Then, it can be shown from
Eq. (\ref{Dir1}) that the meromorphic continuation of $\mbox{\boldmath
$\mu$}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})$ is given by the limiting relation,
\begin{equation}
\label{w}
\lim_{k \to k_j} \left[ \mbox{\boldmath $\mu$} (z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k}) -
\frac{i {\bf \Phi}_j(z,\bar{z})}{k - k_j} \right] =
( z + z_j) {\bf \Phi}_j(z,\bar{z}) + c_j {\bf \Phi}_j'(z,\bar{z}),
\end{equation}
where $z_j$, $c_j$ are some constants. Using Eqs. (\ref{d-bar}),
(\ref{b}), and (\ref{N_2}), we find the differential relation
for $b(k,\bar{k})$,
$$
\frac{\partial b}{\partial \bar{k}} = \frac{b(k,\bar{k})}{2\pi}
\int\!\!\int dz \wedge d\bar{z} \left( \bar{u} \bar{\mu}_2 \right)
(z,\bar{z}) - \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int\!\!\int dz \wedge d \bar{z}
\left( \bar{z} \bar{u} \mu_1 \right)(z,\bar{z}) e^{i(kz + \bar{k}\bar{z})}.
$$
In the limit $k \to k_j$, this equation reduces with the help of
Eqs. (\ref{norm1}) and (\ref{w}) to the form,
$$
\frac{\partial b}{\partial \bar{k}} = \frac{b(k,\bar{k})}{\bar{k} -
\bar{k}_j} - \frac{b_0}{k-k_j},
$$
where $b_0$ is given in Eq. (\ref{constraint}). The reduced equation
exhibits the limiting behavior of $b(k,\bar{k})$ as $k \to k_j$,
\begin{equation}
\label{asympt_b}
b(k,\bar{k}) \rightarrow - b_0 \frac{\bar{k} - \bar{k}_j}{k - k_j}
\ln|\bar{k}-\bar{k}_j|.
\end{equation}
On the other hand, it follows from Eqs. (\ref{N_2}), (\ref{symmetr}),
and (\ref{w}) that ${\bf N}_{\mu}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})$ has the
limiting behavior,
\begin{equation}
\label{asympt_N}
{\bf N}_{\mu}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k}) \rightarrow \frac{- i {\bf
\Phi}_j'(z,\bar{z})}{\bar{k} - \bar{k}_j}.
\end{equation}
According to Eqs. (\ref{asympt_b}) and (\ref{asympt_N}), the
right-hand-side of Eq. (\ref{d-bar}) is of order ${\rm O}(b_0 |k-k_j|^{-1}
\ln|k-k_j|)$ as $k \to k_j$. On the other hand, the left-hand-side of
Eq. (\ref{d-bar}) must be of order $O(1)$ in the limit $k \to k_j$
according to Eq. (\ref{w}). Therefore, the eigenfunction
$\mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})$ has a pole at $k = k_j$
only if the constraint $b_0 = 0$ holds. $\Box$
\\

The limiting relation (\ref{w}) was introduced by Arkadiev {\em et al}
\cite{APP}. However, the authors did not notice that the discrete
spectrum is supported only by potentials which satisfy the additional
constraint (\ref{constraint}). In particular, such potentials include
the multi-lump solutions for which $b(k,\bar{k}) = 0$ everywhere
in the $k$-plane.

\subsection{Expansion Formulas for Inverse Scattering}

Combining Eq. (\ref{d-bar}) for the essential spectrum and Eq. (\ref{w})
for the discrete spectrum, we reconstruct the eigenfunction
$\mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})$ \cite{FA,APP},
\begin{equation}
\label{inverse}
\mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k}) = {\bf e}_1 +
\sum_{j = 1}^n \frac{i {\bf \Phi}_j(z,\bar{z})}{k - k_j} +
\frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int\!\!\int \frac{dk' \wedge d \bar{k}'}{k' - k}
b(k',\bar{k}') {\bf N}_{\mu}(z,\bar{z},k',\bar{k}'),
\end{equation}
where $n$ is number of distinct eigenvalues $k_j$ of double multiplicity.
At $k \to k_j$, this system is coupled with the algebraic system for
the bound states,
\begin{equation}
\label{inverse1}
(z + z_j) {\bf \Phi}_j(z,\bar{z}) + c_j {\bf \Phi}_j'(z,\bar{z})
= {\bf e}_1 + \sum_{l \neq j} \frac{i {\bf \Phi}_l(z,\bar{z})}{k_j - k_l}
+ \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int\!\!\int \frac{dk \wedge d \bar{k}}{k - k_j}
b(k,\bar{k}) {\bf N}_{\mu}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k}).
\end{equation}

Expansion (\ref{inverse}) can be related to the inverse scattering
transform for the potential $u(z,\bar{z})$ \cite{FA,APP}. It follows
from Eq. (\ref{Dir1}) that the eigenfunction
$\mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})$
has the asymptotic expansion as $|k| \to \infty$,
\begin{equation}
\label{connect}
\mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k}) = {\bf e}_1 +
\frac{1}{i k} \mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}_{\infty}(z,\bar{z})
+ {\rm O}(|k|^{-2}),
\end{equation}
where $\mu_{2 \infty}(z,\bar{z}) = \bar{u}(z,\bar{z})$ and
$$
\mu_{1 \infty}(z,\bar{z}) = - \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int \int
\frac{d z' \wedge d \bar{z}'}{z' - z} (|u|^2 )(z',\bar{z}').
$$
We deduce from Eqs. (\ref{inverse}) and (\ref{connect}) that
the potential $\bar{u}(z,\bar{z})$ is expressed through
the eigenfunctions of the Dirac system in the form \cite{FA},
\begin{equation}
\label{poten}
\bar{u}(z,\bar{z}) = - \sum_{j=1}^n \Phi_{2j}(z,\bar{z})
- \frac{1}{2 \pi} \int\!\!\int dk \wedge d \bar{k} \; b(k,\bar{k}) \;
N_{2 \mu}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k}).
\end{equation}

Formulas (\ref{mu1}) to (\ref{poten}) constitute a standard framework
for the inverse scattering transform of the DSII equation with a new
relation (\ref{constraint}). The existence and uniqueness of
solutions of the Fredholm integral equations (\ref{mu1}) and (\ref{mu2})
and the $\bar{\partial}$ problem (\ref{d-bar}) and (\ref{inverse}) were
proved in \cite{BC} and \cite{FS} under the small-norm assumption
for the potential $u(x,y)$,
$$
\left( \sup_{(x,y) \in {\bf R}^2} |u|(x,y) \right) \;
\left( \int\!\!\int |u (x,y)| dx dy \right) < \frac{\pi}{8}.
$$
In this case $n = 0$ and $b(k,\bar{k}) \neq 0$. The nonlinear
two-dimensional Fourier transform associated to this scheme was
discussed in Examples 8-10 of Chapter 7.7 of Ref. \cite{AFbook}.
Indeed, the connection formula (\ref{poten}) implies that there
is a scalar spectral decomposition of $\bar{u}(z,\bar{z})$ through
$N_{2 \mu}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})$ for $n = 0$. In order to close
the decomposition, one could use Eqs. (\ref{b}) and (\ref{N_2})
to construct a ``completeness relation'' for the expansion of
$\delta(z'-z)$ in the form,
$$
\delta(z'-z) = - \frac{1}{2 \pi^2 i} \int\!\!\int dk \wedge d \bar{k}
\bar{N}_{2 \mu}(z',\bar{z}',k,\bar{k}) N_{2 \mu}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k}).
$$
However, we show in Proposition 3.4 below that a completeness
theorem for Eq. (\ref{Dir1}) is different and is based on the
set of eigenfunctions of the adjoint Dirac system.

\section{Basis for a Scalar Spectral Decomposition}

In this section, we specify the adjoint problem for the Dirac system
(\ref{Dir1}) and establish orthogonality and completeness relations.

\subsection{The Adjoint System}

The adjoint system for Eq. (\ref{Dir1}) is
\begin{equation}
\label{adjoint}
\mu^a_{1 z} = i k \mu_1^a - u \mu^a_2, \;\;\;\;
\mu^a_{2 \bar{z}} = \bar{u} \mu^a_1,
\end{equation}
which provides the balance equation,
\begin{equation}
\label{balance}
i (k' - k) \mu_1^a(k') \mu_2(k) = \frac{\partial}{\partial z}
\left[ \mu_1^a(k') \mu_2(k) \right] - \frac{\partial}{\partial \bar{z}}
\left[ \mu_2^a(k') \mu_1(k) \right].
\end{equation}
The system (\ref{adjoint}) admits plane solutions
$\mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}^a(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})$
and oscillatory-type solutions ${\bf N}_{\mu}^a(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})$
with the boundary conditions,
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{b1}
\lim_{|k| \to \infty} \mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}^a(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})
& = & {\bf e}_2, \\
\label{b2}
\lim_{|k| \to \infty} {\bf N}_{\mu}^a(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})
e^{-i(kz+\bar{k}\bar{z})} & = & {\bf e}_1.
\end{eqnarray}
The adjoint eigenfunctions ${\bf N}^a_{\mu}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})$
can be expressed through the Green functions,
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{Nmu1a}
N^a_{1 \mu}(z,\bar{z}) & = & e^{i(kz + \bar{k} \bar{z})} -
\frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int\!\!\int \frac{d z' \wedge d \bar{z}'}{\bar{z}'
- \bar{z}} (u N^a_{2 \mu})(z',\bar{z}')
e^{ik(z-z')+i\bar{k}(\bar{z}-\bar{z}')}, \\
\label{Nmu2a} N^a_{2 \mu}(z,\bar{z}) & = & \frac{1}{2 \pi i}
\int\!\!\int \frac{d z' \wedge d \bar{z}'}{z' - z}
(\bar{u} N^a_{1 \mu} )(z',\bar{z}').
\end{eqnarray}
They are related to the adjoint eigenfunctions $\mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}^a
(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})$ by the formula,
\begin{equation}
\label{adjoint_relation}
{\bf N}_{\mu}^a(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k}) = - \mbox{\boldmath $\sigma$}
\bar{\mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}}^a(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})
e^{i(kz + \bar{k} \bar{z})}.
\end{equation}
Using this representation, we prove the following result.
\\

{\bf Lemma 3.1.} The spectral data $b(k,\bar{k})$ is expressed
in terms of the adjoint eigenfunctions as
\begin{equation}
\label{b-2}
b(k,\bar{k}) = \frac{1}{2 \pi} \int\!\!\int dz \wedge d \bar{z}
( \bar{u} N^a_{1 \mu} )(z,\bar{z}).
\end{equation}

{\em Proof.} Multiplying Eq. (\ref{Nmu1a}) by $\bar{u} \mu_1(k)$,
integrating over $dz \wedge d\bar{z}$ and using Eq. (\ref{mu2}),
we express $b(k,\bar{k})$ defined in Eq. (\ref{b}) in the form,
\begin{equation}
\label{b_relation}
b(k,\bar{k}) = \frac{1}{2 \pi} \int\!\!\int dz \wedge d \bar{z} \left[
\bar{u} \mu_1(k) N^a_{1 \mu}(k) - u \mu_2(k) N^a_{2 \mu}(k) \right].
\end{equation}
On the other hand, multiplying Eq. (\ref{mu1}) by $u N_{1\mu}^a(k)$,
integrating over $dz \wedge d \bar{z}$, and using Eqs. (\ref{Nmu2a})
and (\ref{b_relation}), we get Eq. (\ref{b-2}). $\Box$
\\

Suppose now that $k = k_j$ is an isolated double eigenvalue of Eq.
(\ref{Dir1}) with the bound states ${\bf \Phi}_j(z,\bar{z})$ and
${\bf \Phi}'_j(z,\bar{z})$ given by Eqs. (\ref{hom1}) -- (\ref{symmetr}).
Suppose also that $k = k_j^a$ is an eigenvalue of the adjoint system
(\ref{adjoint}) with the adjoint bound states ${\bf \Phi}_j^a(z,\bar{z})$
and ${\bf \Phi}_j^{a \prime}(z,\bar{z})$.
\\

{\bf Lemma 3.2.} If $k_j$ is a double eigenvalue of the Dirac system
(\ref{Dir1}), then $k_j$ is also a double eigenvalue of the adjoint
system (\ref{adjoint}).

{\em Proof.} We use Eq. (\ref{balance}) with $\mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}
= {\bf \Phi}_j(z,\bar{z})$ and $\mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}^a =
{\bf \Phi}_j^a(z,\bar{z})$ at $k = k_j$ and $k' = k_j^a$ and
integrate over $dz \wedge d \bar{z}$ with the help of Eq. (A.3) of
Appendix A. The contour contribution of the integral vanishes due to
the boundary conditions (\ref{bound}) and (\ref{bound-2}) and the
resulting expression is
$$
(k_j^a - k_j) \int\!\!\int dz \wedge d\bar{z} \;
(\Phi_{1j}^a \Phi_{2j})(z,\bar{z}) = 0.
$$
The relation $k_j^a = k_j$ follows from this formula if the integral is
non-zero at $k_j^a = k_j$ (which is proved below in Eq. (\ref{orth3})).
The other possibility is when $k_j^a \neq k_j$ but $\Phi_{1j}^a$ is
orthogonal to $\Phi_{2j}$. We do not consider such a non-generic situation.
The other bound state ${\bf \Phi}_j^{a \prime}$ at $k_j^a = k_j$ can be
defined  using the symmetry relation (see Eq. (\ref{sym_adjoint}) below).
$\Box$
\\

The adjoint bound state ${\bf \Phi}^a_j(z,\bar{z})$ solves the
homogeneous equations,
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{bou1}
\Phi^a_{1 j}(z,\bar{z}) & = & - \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int\!\!\int
\frac{d z' \wedge d \bar{z}'}{\bar{z}' - \bar{z}} (u
\Phi^a_{2 j})(z',\bar{z}') e^{ik_j(z-z')+i\bar{k}_j(\bar{z}-\bar{z}')}, \\
\label{bou2} \Phi^a_{2 j}(z,\bar{z}) & = & \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int\!\!\int
\frac{d z' \wedge d \bar{z}'}{z' - z} (\bar{u} \Phi^a_{1 j} )(z',\bar{z}')
\end{eqnarray}
with the boundary condition as $|z| \to \infty$,
\begin{equation}
\label{bound-2}
{\bf \Phi}^a_j(z,\bar{z}) \rightarrow \frac{{\bf e}_2}{z},
\end{equation}
and the normalization conditions,
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{norm-1}
-\frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int \int d z \wedge d \bar{z}
(\bar{u} \Phi^a_{1j} )(z,\bar{z}) & = & 1, \\
\label{norm-2}
\frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int \int d z \wedge d \bar{z} ( u \Phi^a_{2j}
)(z,\bar{z}) e^{- i (k_j z + \bar{k}_j \bar{z})} & = & 0.
\end{eqnarray}
In addition, the bound state ${\bf \Phi}_j^{a \prime}(z,\bar{z})$
is related to ${\bf \Phi}(z,\bar{z})$ according to the symmetry formula,
\begin{equation}
\label{sym_adjoint}
{\bf \Phi}_j^{a \prime}(z,\bar{z}) = - \mbox{\boldmath $\sigma$}
\bar{{\bf \Phi}}_j^a(z,\bar{z}) e^{i(k_j z + \bar{k}_j \bar{z})}.
\end{equation}

Using Eqs. (\ref{adjoint})--(\ref{sym_adjoint}), we see that the adjoint
eigenfunction $\mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}^a(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})$ satisfies
relations similar to those for $\mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})$,
\begin{equation}
\label{d-bar_adjoint}
\frac{\partial \mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}^a}{\partial \bar{k}} =
- \bar{b}(k,\bar{k}) {\bf N}_{\mu}^a(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}
\label{w_adjoint}
\lim_{k \to k_j} \left[ \mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}^a (z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k}) +
\frac{i {\bf \Phi}_j^a(z,\bar{z})}{k - k_j} \right] = ( z + z_j)
{\bf \Phi}_j^a(z,\bar{z}) - \bar{c}_j {\bf \Phi}_j^{a \prime}(z,\bar{z}).
\end{equation}

The expansions for inverse scattering transform of the adjoint
eigenfunctions can be found in the form,
\begin{equation}
\label{inverse_adjoint}
\mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}^a(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k}) = {\bf e}_2 -
\sum_{j = 1}^n \frac{i {\bf \Phi}_j^a(z,\bar{z})}{k - k_j} -
\frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int\!\!\int \frac{dk' \wedge d \bar{k}'}{k' - k}
\bar{b}(k',\bar{k}') {\bf N}_{\mu}^a(z,\bar{z},k',\bar{k}')
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}
\label{inverse1_adjoint}
(z' + z_j) {\bf \Phi}_j^a(z',\bar{z}') - \bar{c}_j {\bf \Phi}_j^{a
\prime}(z',\bar{z}') = {\bf e}_2 - \sum_{l \neq j} \frac{i
{\bf \Phi}_l^a(z',\bar{z}')}{k_j - k_l} - \frac{1}{2 \pi i}
\int\!\!\int \frac{dk \wedge d \bar{k}}{k - k_j} \bar{b}(k,\bar{k})
{\bf N}_{\mu}^a(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k}).
\end{equation}

\subsection{Orthogonality and Completeness Relations}

Using the Dirac system (\ref{Dir1}) and its adjoint system (\ref{adjoint}),
we prove the orthogonality and completeness relations for the set of
eigenfunctions $S = [N_{2 \mu}(k,\bar{k}),\{\Phi_{2 j}\}_{j=1}^n]$ and
its adjoint set $S^a = [N^a_{1 \mu}(k,\bar{k}),\{\Phi^a_{1 j}\}_{j=1}^n]$.
\\

{\bf Proposition 3.3.} The eigenfunctions $N_{2 \mu}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})$
and $\Phi_{2 j}(z,\bar{z})$ are orthogonal to the eigenfunctions
$N_{1 \mu}^a(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})$ and $\Phi_{1 j}^a(z,\bar{z})$ as follows
\begin{equation}
\label{orth1}
\langle N^a_{1 \mu}(k') | N_{2 \mu}(k) \rangle_z = - 2 \pi^2 i \delta(k'-k),
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
\label{orth2}
\langle N^a_{1 \mu}(k) | \Phi_{2 j} \rangle_z =
\langle \Phi^a_{1 j} | N_{2 \mu}(k) \rangle_z = 0,
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
\label{orth3}
\langle \Phi^a_{1 l} | \Phi_{2 j} \rangle_z = 2 \pi i \delta_{jl},
\end{equation}
where the inner product is defined as
$$
\langle g(k') | f(k) \rangle_z = \int\!\!\int dz \wedge d \bar{z} \;
g(z,\bar{z},k',\bar{k}') \; f(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k}).
$$

{\em Proof.} Using Eqs. (\ref{Nmu2}) and (\ref{Nmu1a}), we expand
the inner product in Eq. (\ref{orth1}) as
$$
\langle N^a_{1 \mu}(k') | N_{2 \mu}(k) \rangle_z = I_0
$$
$$
+ \int\!\!\int dz \wedge d \bar{z} \left( u N_{2\mu}^a \right)(z,k')
e^{-i(k'z+\bar{k}'\bar{z})} I_1(z) -
\int\!\!\int dz \wedge d \bar{z} \left( \bar{u} N_{1\mu} \right)(z,k)
e^{i(kz+\bar{k}\bar{z})} I_1(z)
$$
$$
+ \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int\!\!\int dz \wedge d \bar{z}
\left( u N_{2\mu}^a \right)(z,k') e^{-i(k'z+\bar{k}'\bar{z})}
\int\!\!\int \frac{dz' \wedge d \bar{z}'}{\bar{z}'-\bar{z}}
\left( \bar{u} N_{1\mu} \right)(z',k)
e^{i(kz'+\bar{k}\bar{z}')} \left[ I_1(z) - I_1(z') \right],
$$
where
\begin{equation} \label{I_0}
I_0 = \int\!\!\int dz \wedge d\bar{z} \;
e^{i(k'-k)z+i(\bar{k}'-\bar{k})\bar{z}} = - 2 \pi^2 i \delta(k'-k)
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation} \label{I_1}
I_1(z) = \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int\!\!\int \frac{dz' \wedge d\bar{z}'}{
\bar{z}'-\bar{z}} e^{i(k'-k)z'+i(\bar{k}'-\bar{k})\bar{z}'}
= \frac{1}{i(k'-k)} e^{i(k'-k)z+i(\bar{k}'-\bar{k})\bar{z}}.
\end{equation}
The integrals $I_0$ and $I_1(z)$ are computed in Appendix A. Using
these formulas, we find the inner product in Eq. (\ref{orth1}) in the form,
$$
\langle N^a_{1 \mu}(k') | N_{2 \mu}(k) \rangle_z = - 2 \pi^2 i
\delta(k'-k) + \frac{1}{i (k'-k)} {\cal R}(k,k'),
$$
where the residual term ${\cal R}(k,k')$ is expressed in the form,
$$
{\cal R}(k,k') = \int\!\!\int dz \wedge d \bar{z} \left[ u N_{2\mu}^a (k')
N_{2\mu}(k) - \bar{u} N_{1\mu}^a(k') N_{1\mu}(k) \right],
$$
with the help of Eqs. (\ref{Nmu2}) and (\ref{Nmu1a}). We show
that ${\cal R}(k,k') = 0$ by multiplying Eq. (\ref{Nmu2a}) by
$\bar{u} N_{1\mu}(k)$, integrating over $dz \wedge d \bar{z}$
and using Eq. (\ref{Nmu1}).

The zero inner products in Eqs. (\ref{orth2}) and (\ref{orth3})
for $j \neq l$ are obtained in a similar way with the help of
the Fredholm's equations for eigenfunctions ${\bf \Phi}_j$,
${\bf \Phi}_j^a$, ${\bf N}_{\mu}$, and ${\bf N}_{\mu}^a$.
In order to find the non-zero inner product (\ref{orth3}) for $j = l$
we evaluate the following integral by using the same integral equations,
\begin{eqnarray*}
\int\!\!\int dz \wedge d \bar{z} \; \Phi_{1j}^a \mu_2(k) & = &
\frac{1}{i(k_j-k)} \int\!\!\int dz \wedge d \bar{z}
\left[ u \Phi_{2j}^a \mu_2(k) - \bar{u} \Phi_{1j}^a \mu_1(k) \right] \\
\phantom{t} & = & \frac{1}{i(k-k_j)} \int\!\!\int dz \wedge d \bar{z}
\; \bar{u} \Phi_{1j}^a.
\end{eqnarray*}
Using Eq. (\ref{norm-1}), the right-hand-side identifies to
$\frac{1}{i(k-k_j)}$. Substituting Eq. (\ref{inverse}) in the
left-hand-side and using the zero inner products (\ref{orth2})
and (\ref{orth3}), we find Eq. (\ref{orth3}) for $j = l$. $\Box$
\\

{\bf Proposition 3.4.} The eigenfunctions $N_{2 \mu}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})$
and $\Phi_{2 j}(z,\bar{z})$ are complete with respect to the adjoint
eigenfunctions $N_{1 \mu}^a(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})$ and
$\Phi_{1 j}^a(z,\bar{z})$ according to the identity,
\begin{equation}
\label{complet}
\delta(z'-z) = - \frac{1}{2 \pi^2 i} \int\!\!\int dk \wedge d \bar{k}
N^a_{1 \mu}(z',\bar{z}',k,\bar{k}) N_{2 \mu}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})
- \frac{1}{\pi} \sum_{j=1}^n \Phi^a_{1 j}(z',\bar{z}') \Phi_{2 j}(z,\bar{z}).
\end{equation}

{\em Proof.} Using the symmetry relations (\ref{N_2}) and
(\ref{adjoint_relation}), we express the integral in Eq. (\ref{complet}) as
\begin{equation}
\label{integral_help}
\langle N^a_{1 \mu}(z') | N_{2 \mu}(z) \rangle_k = \int\!\!\int
dk \wedge d \bar{k} \; \bar{\mu}^a_2(z',\bar{z}',k,\bar{k}) \bar{\mu}_1
(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k}) e^{ik(z'-z) + i\bar{k}(\bar{z}'-\bar{z})}.
\end{equation}
We use Eqs. (\ref{inverse}), (\ref{inverse1}), (\ref{inverse_adjoint}),
and (\ref{inverse1_adjoint}) and find the pole decomposition for the
integrand in Eq. (\ref{integral_help}),
$$
\bar{\mu}^a_2 (z') \bar{\mu}_1(z) = 1 + \sum_{j=1}^n \frac{i}{\bar{k} -
\bar{k}_j} \left[ \bar{c}_j \bar{\Phi}_{2j}^a(z',\bar{z}')
\bar{\Phi}_{1j}'(z,\bar{z}) + c_j \bar{\Phi}_{2j}^{a \prime}(z',\bar{z}')
\bar{\Phi}_{1j}(z,\bar{z}) \right]
$$
$$
+ \sum_{j=1}^n \frac{i}{\bar{k} - \bar{k}_j} (\bar{z} - \bar{z}')
\bar{\Phi}_{2j}^a(z',\bar{z}') \bar{\Phi}_{1j}(z,\bar{z})
+ \sum_{j=1}^n \frac{\bar{\Phi}_{2j}^a(z',\bar{z}')
\bar{\Phi}_{1j}(z,\bar{z})}{(\bar{k} - \bar{k}_j)^2}
$$
\begin{equation}
\label{integral_help2}
+ \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int\!\!\int \frac{dk' \wedge d \bar{k}'}{\bar{k}' -
\bar{k}} \left[ \bar{\mu}_2^a(z') \bar{b} \bar{N}_{1 \mu}(z) -
\bar{\mu}_1(z) b \bar{N}_{2 \mu}^a(z') \right](k',\bar{k}').
\end{equation}
We substitute (\ref{integral_help2}) into Eq. (\ref{integral_help})
and reduce the integral to the form,
$$
\langle N^a_{1 \mu}(z') | N_{2 \mu}(z) \rangle_k = I_0 - 2 \pi
\sum_{j=1}^n \left[ \bar{c}_j \bar{\Phi}_{2j}^a(z',\bar{z}')
\bar{\Phi}_{1j}'(z,\bar{z}) + c_j \bar{\Phi}_{2j}^{a \prime}(z',\bar{z}')
\bar{\Phi}_{1j}(z,\bar{z}) \right]  \; I_1(k_j)
$$
$$
+ \sum_{j=1}^n \bar{\Phi}_{2j}^a(z',\bar{z}') \bar{\Phi}_{1j}(z,\bar{z})
\left[ 2 \pi (\bar{z}' - \bar{z}) I_1(k_j) + I_2(k_j) \right]
$$
\begin{equation}
\label{integral_help1}
- \int\!\!\int dk \wedge d \bar{k} I_1(k) \left[  \bar{\mu}_2^a(z')
\bar{b} \bar{N}_{1 \mu}(z) - \bar{\mu}_1(z) b \bar{N}_{2 \mu}^a(z')
\right](k,\bar{k}) e^{-ik(z'-z)-i\bar{k}(\bar{z}'-\bar{z})},
\end{equation}
where the integrals $I_0$ and $I_1(k)$ are given in Eqs. (\ref{I_0})
and (\ref{I_1}) respectively, with $z$ and $k$ interchanged,
while the integral $I_2(k_j)$ is defined by
\begin{equation}
\label{I_2}
I_2(k_j) = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \int\!\!\int_{|k-k_j|\geq \epsilon}
\frac{d k \wedge d \bar{k}}{(\bar{k} - \bar{k}_j)^2} e^{ik(z'-z)
+ i \bar{k} (\bar{z}'-\bar{z})}.
\end{equation}
The integral $I_2(k)$ is found in Appendix A in the form,
$I_2(k_j) = - 2 \pi (\bar{z}'-\bar{z}) I_1(k_j)$, such that
the third term in Eq. (\ref{integral_help1}) vanishes. In order
to express the second term in Eq. (\ref{integral_help1}) we use
Eqs. (\ref{inverse1}), (\ref{inverse1_adjoint}), (\ref{symmetr}),
and (\ref{sym_adjoint}) and derive the relation,
$$
- \sum_{j=1}^n \left[ \bar{c}_j \bar{\Phi}_{2j}^a(z',\bar{z}')
\bar{\Phi}_{1j}'(z,\bar{z}) + c_j \bar{\Phi}_{2j}^{a \prime}(z'\bar{z}')
\bar{\Phi}_{1j}(z,\bar{z}) \right] e^{ik_j(z'-z) +
i \bar{k}_j (\bar{z}'-\bar{z})} =
$$
$$
\sum_{j=1}^n \left[ \bar{c}_j \Phi_{1j}^{a \prime}(z',\bar{z}')
\Phi_{2j}(z,\bar{z}) + c_j \Phi_{1j}^a(z',\bar{z}')
\Phi_{2j}'(z,\bar{z}) \right] =
$$
\begin{equation}
(z'-z) \sum_{j=1}^n \Phi_{1j}^a(z',\bar{z}') \Phi_{2j}(z,\bar{z})
+  \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \sum_{j=1}^n \int\!\!\int \frac{dk \wedge
d \bar{k}}{k - k_j} \left[ \Phi_{2j}(z) \bar{b} N_{1 \mu}^a(z') +
\Phi_{1j}^a(z') b N_{2 \mu}(z) \right](k,\bar{k}).
\label{help21}
\end{equation}
Using this expression and Eqs. (\ref{I_0}), (\ref{I_1}), and (\ref{I_2}),
we rewrite Eq. (\ref{integral_help1}) in the form,
$$
\langle N^a_{1 \mu}(z') | N_{2 \mu}(z) \rangle_k = - 2 \pi^2 i
\delta(z'-z) - 2 \pi i \sum_{j=1}^n \Phi_{1j}^a(z',\bar{z}')
\Phi_{2j}(z,\bar{z})
$$
$$
+ \frac{i}{z'-z} \int\!\!\int dk \wedge
d \bar{k} \frac{\partial}{\partial \bar{k}} \left[  \left( \mu_1^a(z')
+ \sum_{j=1}^n \frac{i \Phi_{1j}^a(z')}{k-k_j} \right) \left(
\mu_2(z) - \sum_{j=1}^n \frac{i \Phi_{2j}(z)}{k-k_j} \right) \right].
$$
The last integral vanishes according to Eq. (A.3) of Appendix A and
the boundary conditions (\ref{limit}) and (\ref{b1}). $\Box$
\\

Our main result for the spectral decomposition associated to the
Dirac system (\ref{Dir1}) follows from the above orthogonality and
completeness relations. \\

{\bf Proposition 3.5.} An arbitrary scalar function $f(z,\bar{z})$
satisfying the condition $f(z,\bar{z}) \sim {\rm O}(|z|^{-2})$ as $|z|
\to \infty$ can be decomposed through the set $S = [ N_{2 \mu}(z,
\bar{z},k,\bar{k}), \{ \Phi_{2 j}(z,\bar{z}) \}_{j=1}^n ]$. \\

{\em Proof.} The spectral decomposition is defined through
the orthogonality relations (\ref{orth1})--(\ref{orth3}) as
\begin{equation}
\label{decomp}
f(z,\bar{z}) = \int\!\!\int dk \wedge d\bar{k} \alpha(k,\bar{k})
N_{2 \mu}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k}) + \sum_{j=1}^n \alpha_j \Phi_{2j}(z,\bar{z}),
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation}
\label{coefficients}
\alpha(k,\bar{k}) = - \frac{1}{4 \pi^2} \langle N_{1\mu}^a(k) | f \rangle_z,
\;\;\;\;\alpha_j = \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \langle \Phi_{1j}^a | f \rangle_z.
\end{equation}
Provided the condition on $f(z,\bar{z})$ is satisfied, we interchange
integration with respect to $d z \wedge d \bar{z}$ and $d k \wedge
d \bar{k}$ and use the completeness formula (\ref{complet}). $\Box$ \\

The spectral decomposition presented here is different from that of
Kiselev \cite{K1,K2}. In the latter approach, the function $f(z,\bar{z})$
is spanned by {\em squared} eigenfunctions of the original problem
(\ref{Dir}) defined according to oscillatory-type behaviour at
infinity. In our approach, we transformed the system (\ref{Dir})
to the form (\ref{Dir1}) and defined the oscillatory-type
eigenfunctions according to the {\em single} eigenfunctions
${\bf N}_{\mu}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})$. We also notice that the
(degenerate) bound states ${\bf \Phi}_j'(z,\bar{z})$ are not relevant
for the spectral decomposition, although they appear implicitly
through the meromorphic contributions of the eigenfunctions
${\bf N}_{\mu}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})$ at $k = k_j$ (see Section 4).

\section{Perturbation Theory for a Single Lump}

We use the scalar spectral decomposition based on Eq. (\ref{decomp})
and develop a perturbation theory for multi-lump solutions of the
DSII equation. We present formulas in the case of a single lump ($n=1$),
the case of multi-lump potentials can be obtained by summing
along the indices $j$, $l$ occuring in the expressions below.

The single-lump potential $u(z,\bar{z})$ has the form \cite{APP},
\begin{equation}
\label{single_lump}
u(z,\bar{z}) = \frac{c_j}{|z+z_j|^2 + |c_j|^2} e^{i(k_j z +
\bar{k}_j \bar{z})},
\end{equation}
where $c_j$, $z_j$ are complex parameters. The associated bound states
follow from Eqs. (\ref{inverse1}) and (\ref{inverse1_adjoint}) as
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{single_bound1}
{\bf \Phi}_j(z,\bar{z}) & = & \frac{1}{|z+z_j|^2 + |c_j|^2}
\left[ \begin{array}{c} \bar{z} + \bar{z}_j \\ - \bar{c}_j
e^{-i(k_j z + \bar{k}_j \bar{z})} \end{array} \right], \\
\label{single_bound2}
{\bf \Phi}_j^a(z,\bar{z}) & = & \frac{1}{|z+z_j|^2 + |c_j|^2}
\left[ \begin{array}{c} c_j e^{i(k_j z + \bar{k}_j \bar{z})} \\
\bar{z} + \bar{z}_j \end{array} \right].
\end{eqnarray}
We first consider a general perturbation to the single lump
subject to the localization condition, $\Delta u \sim
{\rm O}(|z|^{-2})$ as $|z| \to \infty$. We then derive
explicit formulas for a special form of the perturbation
term $\Delta u(z,\bar{z})$.

\subsection{General Perturbation of a Single Lump}

Suppose the potential is specified as $u^{\epsilon}
= u(z,\bar{z}) + \epsilon \Delta u (z,\bar{z})$, where $u(z,\bar{z})$
is given by Eq. (\ref{single_lump}) and $\Delta u(z,\bar{z})$ is a
perturbation term. Two bound states ${\bf \Phi}_j(z,\bar{z})$ and
${\bf \Phi}'_j(z,\bar{z})$ are supported by a single-lump potential
$u(z,\bar{z})$ at a single point $k = k_j$. The spectral decomposition
given by Eq. (\ref{decomp}) provides a basis for expansion of
$\mu^{\epsilon}_2(z,\bar{z},\kappa,\bar{\kappa})$ at $k = \kappa$,
\begin{equation}
\label{mu2-e}
\mu_2^{\epsilon}(z,\bar{z},\kappa,\bar{\kappa}) = \int\!\!\int dk \wedge
d \bar{k} \; \alpha(k,\bar{k}) N_{2 \mu}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k}) +
\alpha_j \Phi_{2 j}(z,\bar{z})
\end{equation}
where $\alpha(k,\bar{k})$ and $\alpha_j$ are defined by Eq.
(\ref{coefficients}) and depend on the parameter $\kappa$.
The other component $\mu_1^{\epsilon}(z,\bar{z},\kappa,\bar{\kappa})$
can be expressed from Eq. (\ref{Dir1}) as
\begin{equation}
\label{mu1-e}
\mu_1^{\epsilon}(z,\bar{z},\kappa,\bar{\kappa}) = \int\!\!\int
dk \wedge d \bar{k} \; \alpha(k,\bar{k}) N_{1 \mu}(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})
+ \alpha_j \Phi_{1 j}(z,\bar{z}) + \epsilon \Delta \mu_1(z,\bar{z}),
\end{equation}
where the remainder term $\Delta \mu_1(z,\bar{z})$ solves the equation,
$$
\left( \Delta \mu_1 \right)_{\bar{z}} = - \Delta u \mu_2^{\epsilon}.
$$
We write the solution of this equation in the form,
\begin{equation}
\label{solut-mu1}
\Delta \mu_1(z,\bar{z}) = A - \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int\!\!\int
\frac{d z' \wedge d \bar{z}'}{z'-z} \left( \Delta u \mu_2^{\epsilon}
\right)(z',\bar{z}'),
\end{equation}
subject to the boundary condition as $|z| \to \infty$,
$$
\Delta \mu_1(z,\bar{z}) \to A + {\rm O}(z^{-1}),
$$
where $A$ is an arbitrary constant. Using the explicit representation
(\ref{solut-mu1}), we transform Eq. (\ref{Dir1}) into the system of
integral equations for $\alpha(k,\bar{k})$ and $\alpha_j$,
\begin{equation}
\label{integ1}
\alpha(k,\bar{k}) = \frac{\epsilon}{4 \pi^2 i(k - \kappa)} \left[
\int\!\!\int dk' \wedge d\bar{k}' \; K(k,\bar{k},k',\bar{k}')
\alpha(k',\bar{k}') + K_j(k,\bar{k}) \alpha_j + R(k,\bar{k}) A \right]
+ {\rm O}(\epsilon^2),
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
\label{integ2}
\alpha_j = \frac{\epsilon}{2 \pi (k_j - \kappa)} \left[ \int\!\!\int
dk \wedge d \bar{k} \; P_j(k,\bar{k}) \alpha(k,\bar{k})
+ K_{jl} \alpha_l + R_j A \right] + {\rm O}(\epsilon^2),
\end{equation}
where
$$
K(k,\bar{k},k',\bar{k}') = \langle {\bf N}^a_{\mu}(k) |
{\bf N}_{\mu}(k') \rangle_{\Delta u}, \;\;\;\;
K_j(k,\bar{k}) = \langle {\bf N}^a_{\mu}(k) |
{\bf \Phi}_j \rangle_{\Delta u},
$$
$$
P_j(k,\bar{k}) = \langle {\bf \Phi}^a_j |
{\bf N}_{\mu}(k) \rangle_{\Delta u}, \;\;\;\;
K_{jl} = \langle {\bf \Phi}^a_j |
{\bf \Phi}_l \rangle_{\Delta u}, \;\;\;\;
$$
and the scalar product for squared eigenfunction is defined as \cite{K1,K2}
$$
\langle {\bf f}(k) | {\bf g}(k') \rangle_h = \int\!\!\int dz \wedge
d \bar{z} \left[ \bar{h}(z,\bar{z}) f_1(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})
g_1(z,\bar{z},k',\bar{k}') + h(z,\bar{z}) f_2(z,\bar{z},k,\bar{k})
g_2(z,\bar{z},k',\bar{k}') \right].
$$
The non-homogeneous terms $R(k,\bar{k})$ and $R_j$ can be computed
exactly as
\begin{eqnarray*}
R(k,\bar{k}) & = & \int\!\!\int dz \wedge d \bar{z} \; \left( \bar{u}
N^a_{1 \mu} \right) (z,\bar{z}) = 2 \pi b(k,\bar{k}), \\
R_j & = & \int\!\!\int dz \wedge d \bar{z} \left( \bar{u} \Phi^a_{1 j}
\right) (z,\bar{z}) = - 2 \pi i,
\end{eqnarray*}
where $b(k,\bar{k}) = 0$ if $n \neq 0$. We solve the system of equations
(\ref{integ1}) and (\ref{integ2}) asymptotically for $\kappa = k_j +
\epsilon \Delta \kappa$ and $\Delta \kappa \sim {\rm O}(1)$. The leading
order behaviour of the integral kernels follows from the asymptotic
representation (\ref{asympt_N}) as $k \to k_j$,
\begin{equation}
\label{asympt1}
K(k,\bar{k},k',\bar{k}') \to \frac{\bar{K}_{jj}}{(\bar{k} - \bar{k}_j)
(\bar{k}' - \bar{k}_j)}, \;\;\;\; K_j(k,\bar{k}) \to \frac{i P_{jj}}{
\bar{k} - \bar{k}_j}, \;\;\;\;P_j(k,\bar{k}) \to \frac{i \bar{P}_{jj}}{
\bar{k} - \bar{k}_j},
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation}
\label{elements}
\bar{K}_{jj} = \langle {\bf \Phi}^{a \prime}_j |
{\bf \Phi}'_j \rangle_{\Delta u}, \;\;\;\;
P_{jj} = \langle {\bf \Phi}^{a \prime}_j | {\bf \Phi}_j
\rangle_{\Delta u}, \;\;\;\; \bar{P}_{jj} = - \langle
{\bf \Phi}^a_j | {\bf \Phi}'_j \rangle_{\Delta u}.
\end{equation}
Here we have used the symmetry constraints (\ref{symmetr}) and
(\ref{sym_adjoint}). The leading order of $\alpha(k,\bar{k})$ as
$k \to k_j$ follows from Eq. (\ref{integ1}) as
$$
\alpha(k,\bar{k}) \to - \frac{\epsilon \Delta \bar{\kappa}
\beta_j}{2 \pi (k - \kappa) (\bar{k} - \bar{k}_j)},
$$
where $\beta_j$ is not yet defined. We use Eq. (A.4) of Appendix A
to compute the integral term,
$$
\int\!\!\int \frac{d k \wedge d \bar{k}}{(k - \kappa)(\bar{k} -
\bar{k}_j)^2} = \frac{2 \pi i}{\bar{k}_j - \bar{\kappa}},
$$
and reduce the system of integral equations (\ref{integ1})
and (\ref{integ2}) to an algebraic system as $k \to k_j$,
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{algeb1}
- 2 \pi \Delta \kappa \alpha_j & = & K_{jj} \alpha_j - \bar{P}_{jj} \beta_j
- 2 \pi i A, \\ \label{algeb2} 2 \pi \Delta \bar{\kappa} \beta_j & = &
- P_{jj} \alpha_j - \bar{K}_{jj} \beta_j.
\end{eqnarray}
If $P_{jj} \neq 0$, the determinant of the above system is strictly
positive. Therefore, homogeneous solutions at $A = 0$ (bound states)
are absent for $\epsilon \neq 0$. This result indicates that the
double eigenvalue at $k = k_j$ disappears under a generic
perturbation of the potential $u(z,\bar{z})$ with $P_{jj} \neq 0$
(see also Ref. \cite{GK1}).

For $A \neq 0$, we find inhomogeneous solutions of Eqs.
(\ref{algeb1}) and (\ref{algeb2}),
\begin{equation}
\label{solution}
\alpha_j = \frac{2 \pi i A \left( \bar{K}_{jj} + 2 \pi \Delta \bar{\kappa}
\right)}{|K_{jj} + 2 \pi \Delta \kappa|^2 + |P_{jj}|^2}, \;\;\;\;
\beta_j = \frac{- 2 \pi i A P_{jj}}{|K_{jj} + 2 \pi \Delta \kappa|^2
+ |P_{jj}|^2}.
\end{equation}
The eigenfunction $\mbox{\boldmath
$\mu$}^{\epsilon}(z,\bar{z},\kappa,\bar{\kappa})$
given by Eqs. (\ref{mu2-e}) and (\ref{mu1-e}) satisfies the boundary
condition (\ref{limit}) if $A = \epsilon^{-1}$ and has the following
asymptotic representation,
\begin{eqnarray}
\nonumber
\mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}^{\epsilon}(z,\bar{z},\kappa,\bar{\kappa}) = {\bf e}_1
+ \frac{2 \pi i \left[ 2 \pi (\bar{\kappa} - \bar{k}_j) + \epsilon
\bar{K}_{jj} \right] {\bf \Phi}_j(z,\bar{z})}{|2 \pi (\kappa - k_j) +
\epsilon K_{jj}|^2 + |\epsilon P_{jj}|^2} & - & \frac{2 \pi i \epsilon
P_{jj} {\bf \Phi}'_j(z,\bar{z})}{|2 \pi (\kappa - k_j) + \epsilon
K_{jj}|^2 + |\epsilon P_{jj}|^2} \\
\label{expansion}
& + & \Delta \mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}^{\epsilon}(z,\bar{z}),
\end{eqnarray}
where the term $\Delta \mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}^{\epsilon}(z,\bar{z})$
is not singular in the limit $\epsilon \to 0$ and $\kappa \to k_j$.

In the limit $\epsilon \to 0$, $\kappa \neq k_j$, we find a meromorphic
expansion for ${\bf \mu}^{\epsilon}(z,\bar{z},\kappa,\bar{\kappa})$ as
\begin{equation}
\label{expans1}
\mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}^{\epsilon}(z,\bar{z},\kappa,\bar{\kappa}) =
{\bf e}_1 + \frac{i {\bf \Phi}_j(z,\bar{z})}{\kappa - k_j} +
\epsilon \left[ \frac{K_{jj} {\bf \Phi}_j(z,\bar{z})}{2 \pi i
(\kappa - k_j)^2} + \frac{P_{jj} {\bf \Phi}'_j(z,\bar{z})}{2 \pi i
|\kappa - k_j|^2} \right] + {\rm O}(\epsilon^2).
\end{equation}
It is clear that the double pole can be incorporated by shifting
the eigenvalue $k_j$ to
$$
k_j^{\epsilon} = k_j - \frac{\epsilon K_{jj}}{2 \pi}.
$$
The other double-pole term in the expansion (\ref{expans1}) has a
non-analytic behaviour in the $k$-plane and leads to the appearance
of the spectral data $b^{\epsilon}(\kappa,\bar{\kappa}) = \epsilon \Delta
b(\kappa,\bar{\kappa})$ which measures the departure of $\mbox{\boldmath
$\mu$}^{\epsilon}(z,\bar{z},\kappa,\bar{\kappa})$ from analyticity
according to Eq. (\ref{d-bar}). We find from Eqs. (\ref{b}) and
(\ref{expans1}) that the spectral data $\Delta b(\kappa,\bar{\kappa})$
has the following singular behaviour as $\kappa \to k_j$
\begin{equation}
\label{DB}
\Delta b(\kappa,\bar{\kappa}) \to \frac{- P_{jj}}{2 \pi |\kappa - k_j|^2}.
\end{equation}
Thus, if $P_{jj} \neq 0$ the analyticity of $\mbox{\boldmath
$\mu$}^{\epsilon}(z,\bar{z},\kappa,\bar{\kappa})$ is destroyed and the
lump disappears. This conclusion as well as the analytical solution
(\ref{solution}) agree with the results of Gadyl'shin and Kiselev
\cite{GK1,GK2} where the transformation of a single lump into decaying
wave packet was also studied.

In the other limit $\epsilon \neq 0$ and $\kappa \to k_j^{\epsilon}$
we find another expansion from Eq. (\ref{expansion}),
\begin{equation}
\label{expans2}
\mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}^{\epsilon}(z,\bar{z},\kappa,\bar{\kappa}) =
{\bf e}_1 - \frac{2 \pi i}{\epsilon \bar{P}_{jj}} {\bf \Phi}'_j(z,\bar{z})
+ {\rm O}(\kappa - k_j^{\epsilon}).
\end{equation}
We conclude that the eigenfunction $\mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}^{\epsilon}(
z,\bar{z},\kappa,\bar{\kappa})$ is now free of pole singularities
\cite{GK1,GK2}. We summarize the main result in the form of a proposition.
\\

{\bf Proposition 4.1.} Suppose $u(z,\bar{z})$ is given by Eq.
(\ref{single_lump}) and $\Delta u(z,\bar{z})$ satisfies the constraint,
$$
P_{jj} = \langle {\bf \Phi}^{a \prime}_j | {\bf \Phi}_j
\rangle_{\Delta u} \neq 0.
$$
Then, the potential $u^{\epsilon} = u(z,\bar{z}) + \epsilon \Delta
u(z,\bar{z})$ does not support embedded eigenvalues of the Dirac system
(\ref{Dir1}) for $\epsilon \neq 0$.
\\

\subsection{Explicit Solution for a Particular Perturbation}

Here we specify $c_j = c e^{i \theta}$, where $c$ and $\theta$ are real,
and consider a particular perturbation $\Delta u(z,\bar{z})$
to the lump $u(z,\bar{z})$ (\ref{single_lump}) in the form,
$$
\Delta u(z,\bar{z}) = Q(z,\bar{z}) e^{i(k_j z +
\bar{k}_j \bar{z} + \theta )},
$$
where $Q(z,\bar{z})$ is a real function. Using Eqs. (\ref{elements}),
(\ref{single_bound1}), and (\ref{single_bound2}), we find explicitly
the matrix elements $K_{jj}$ and $P_{jj}$,
$$
K_{jj} = \int\!\!\int dz \wedge d \bar{z} \frac{c (\bar{z} + \bar{z}_j)
[Q(z,\bar{z}) - \bar{Q}(z,\bar{z})]}{[|z+z_j|^2 + c^2 ]^2} = 0,
$$
$$
P_{jj} = \int\!\!\int dz \wedge d \bar{z} \frac{|z + z_j|^2 \bar{Q}(z,\bar{z})
+  c^2 Q(z,\bar{z})}{[|z+z_j|^2 + c^2 ]^2} =
\frac{1}{2 c} \int\!\!\int dz \wedge d \bar{z} \left( u \Delta \bar{u}
+ \bar{u} \Delta u \right).
$$
The element $P_{jj}$ can be seen as a correction to the field energy,
$$
N = \frac{i}{2} \int\!\!\int dz \wedge d \bar{z} |u^{\epsilon}|^2(z,\bar{z})
= N_0 + i \epsilon c P_{jj} + {\rm O}(\epsilon^2),
$$
where $N_0 = \pi$ is the energy of the single lump solution (independent
of the lump parameters $k_j$ and $c_j$). Thus, a perturbation which leads
to the destruction of a single lump, that is with $P_{jj} \neq 0$, changes
necessarily the value for the lump energy $N_0$.

\section{Concluding Remarks}

The main result of our paper is the prediction of structural instability of
multi-lump potentials in the Dirac system associated to the DSII equation.
The multi-lump potentials correspond to eigenvalues embedded into a
two-dimensional continuous spectrum with the spectral data $b(k,\bar{k})$
satisfying the additional constraint (\ref{constraint}). In
this case, there is no interaction between lumps and continuous radiation.
However, a generic initial perturbation induces coupling between the lumps
and radiation and, as a result of their interaction, the embedded
eigenvalues disappear. This result indicates that the localized multi-lump
solutions decay into continuous wave packets in the nonlinear dynamics
of the DSII equation (see also Refs. \cite{GK1,GK2}).

This scenario is different from the two types of
bifurcations of embedded eigenvalues discussed in our previous paper
\cite{PS}. The type I bifurcation arises from the edge of the essential
spectrum when the limiting bounded (non-localized) eigenfunction is
transformed into a localized bound state. The type II bifurcation occurs
when an embedded eigenvalue splits off the essential spectrum. Both
situations persist in the spectral plane when the essential spectrum
is one-dimensional and covers either a half-axis or the whole axis.
However, in the case of the DSII equation, the essential spectrum
is the whole spectral plane and embedded eigenvalue can not
split off the essential spectrum. As a result, they disappear
due to their structural instability.

\section*{Acknowledgements}
We benefited from stimulating discussions with M. Ablowitz,
A. Fokas, D. Kaup, O. Kiselev, and A. Yurov. D.P. acknowledges
support from a NATO fellowship provided by NSERC and C.S.
acknowledges support from NSERC Operating grant OGP0046179.

\section*{Appendix A. Formulas of the $\partial$-analysis}

Here we reproduce some formulas of the complex $\bar{\partial}$-analysis
\cite{AFbook} to compute the integrals $I_0$, $I_1(z)$ and $I_2(z)$
defined in Eqs. (\ref{I_0}), (\ref{I_1}), and (\ref{I_2}). We define
the complex integration in the $z$-plane by
$$
\int\!\!\int dz \wedge d \bar{z} f(z,\bar{z}) =
- \int\!\!\int d \bar{z} \wedge d z f(z,\bar{z}),
$$
where $dz \wedge d\bar{z} = - 2 i dx dy$. The complex $\delta(z)$
distribution is defined by
$$
\int\!\!\int dz \wedge d \bar{z} f(z) \delta(z - z_0) = -2i f(z_0),
\eqno(A.1)
$$
where $\delta(z) = \delta(x) \delta(y)$. In particular, the
$\delta$-distribution appears in the $\bar{\partial}$-analysis
according to the relation \cite{AFbook},
$$
\frac{\partial}{\partial \bar{z}} \left[ \frac{1}{z - z_0} \right]
= \pi \delta(z - z_0).
\eqno(A.2)
$$
Computing the integral $I_0$, we get the formula,
$$
I_0 = \int\!\!\int dz \wedge d \bar{z} e^{ikz + i\bar{k} \bar{z}} =
- 2 i \int\!\!\int dx dy e^{2 i {\rm Re}(k) x - 2 i {\rm Im}(k) y} =
- 2 \pi^2 i \delta(k),
$$
which proves the identity (\ref{I_0}).

Using the Green's theorem \cite{AFbook}, one has the integration identity,
$$
\int\!\!\int_D dz \wedge d \bar{z} \left( \frac{\partial f_1}{\partial z}
- \frac{\partial f_2}{\partial \bar{z}} \right) = \int_C
\left( f_1 d\bar{z} + f_2 d z \right),
\eqno(A.3)
$$
where $D$ is a domain of the complex plane and $C$ its boundary. The
generalized Cauchy's formula has the form \cite{AFbook},
$$
f(z,\bar{z}) = \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int_C \frac{f(z',\bar{z}') d z'}{z' - z}
+ \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int\!\!\int_D \frac{dz' \wedge d \bar{z}'}{z'-z}
\frac{\partial f}{\partial \bar{z}'},
\eqno(A.4)
$$
or, equivalently,
$$
f(z,\bar{z}) = - \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int_C \frac{f(z',\bar{z}') d \bar{z}'}{
\bar{z}' - \bar{z}} + \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int\!\!\int_D \frac{dz' \wedge
d \bar{z}'}{\bar{z}'-\bar{z}} \frac{\partial f}{\partial z'}.
\eqno(A.5)
$$

In order to find the integral $I_1(z)$ we use Eq. (A.5) with
$$
f(z,\bar{z}) = \frac{1}{i k} e^{i(kz + \bar{k} \bar{z})}, \;\;\; k \neq 0
$$
and choose the domain $D$ to be a large ball of radius $R$ (see Eq.
(\ref{comp_integr})). The boundary value integral vanishes since
$$
\lim_{R \to \infty} \int_{|z|=R} \frac{d \bar{z}}{\bar{z}}
e^{i(kz+\bar{k}\bar{z})} = - 2 \pi i \lim_{R \to \infty}
J_0(2|k|R) = 0,
\eqno(A.6)
$$
where $J_0(z)$ is the Bessel function. Equation (A.5) for the function
$f(z,\bar{z})$ then reduces to Eq. (\ref{I_1}).

In order to compute the integral $I_2(z_0)$, we apply Eq. (A.3) with
$f_1 = 0$ and
$$
f_2(z,\bar{z}) = \frac{1}{\bar{z}-\bar{z}_0} e^{i(kz+\bar{k}\bar{z})}.
$$
The domain $D$ is chosen as above. The boundary value integral vanishes again,
$$
\lim_{R \to \infty} \int_{|z| = R} \frac{d z}{\bar{z}}
e^{i(kz+\bar{k}\bar{z})} = - 2 \pi i \lim_{R \to \infty}
J_{-2}(2|k|R) = 0,
\eqno(A.7)
$$
where $J_{-2}(z)$ is the Bessel function. Equation (A.3) for
the function $f_2(z,\bar{z})$ reduces to Eq. (\ref{I_2}).